this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2026
386 points (98.7% liked)
Technology
84105 readers
3873 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So what you mean to tell me is that every 3D printer in New York is going to come with an index of firearm components?
There is no such technology. This will effectively ban 3d printers until there is. It's not as trivial as they make it sound
Not to mention that someone's going to come out with a jailbreak option for every 3D printer within a couple of weeks of this being implemented at a manufacturing scale.
I mean, at the end of the day, we're talking stepper motors, switches, a resistive heater, (EDIT: or two. Forgot about the heated bed) a thermistor (or two, heated bed again), a few fans. maybe a solenoid. What you're usually buying with a 3d printer is the hardware and the mechanical engineering that went into it, The on board software is... sufficient, but there's a reason things like Octoprint and Klipper are so popular.
Someone outside the USA who is annoyed at stupid US policies fucking over the rest of the world yet again.
Given that the printer itself has just enough computing power to just understand "by how many steps I need to move that motor" (or little more) I suppose it should be done at a slicer level, which would be interesting to do.
So people will start distributing presliced gcode.
Yes, but you can tied the printer to a specific slicer in a number of ways.
And you can make the electronic board in a way so that you cannot phisically update the firmware. (Putting it in a read only memory for example)
You can alter the firmware (that you save is in a read only memory) to refuse to load gcode directly from a USB stick, you can have the firmware ask the slicer for a specific handshake protocol. Basically once you can couple the firmware with the slicer and make it not upgradable you can do whatever you want except maybe heavy cryptography. If the only way to change the firmware is to replace the board, I bet a lot of people would do not it and who would do it can simply build their printer from scratch.
It would make the printer more exepnsive, sure, but that does not seems to be a problem to the law. Also, it would kill the opensource slicer (or at least try).