this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2026
1331 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

84041 readers
3062 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
1331
Stop Killing Games delivers 'absolutely incredible' hearing in European Parliament: 'There was no [parliament member] that wasn't responding positively' (www.pcgamer.com)
submitted 1 day ago by ekZepp@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
216 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

It's amazing what a difference a little bit of time can make: Two years after kicking off what looked to be a long-shot campaign to push back on the practice of shutting down server-dependent videogames once they're no longer profitable, Stop Killing Games founder Ross Scott and organizer Moritz Katzner appeared in front of the European Parliament to present their case—and it seemed to go very well.

Official Stream: https://multimedia.europarl.europa.eu/en/webstreaming/committee-on-internal-market-and-consumer-protection-ordinary-meeting-committee-on-legal-affairs-com_20260416-1100-COMMITTEE-IMCO-JURI-PETI

Digital Fairness Act: https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/14622-Digital-Fairness-Act/F33096034_en

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

non-inclusive term: white-hat

Uh, sorry to comment besides the subject, but could someone explain why white-hat is non-inclusive? I'm not trying to argue it is not, but I had not heard that and I can't find any answers by searching about it

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

There's been a push in IT (and I assume other industries as well) towards inclusive-language.

Part of that is moving away from phrasing that has non-technical historical connotations...like using "leader/follower" or "primary/secondary" instead of "master/slave".

But another part is also getting away from catagorizing things as good/bad on a white/black spectrum. We no longer blacklist things, we denylist or blocklist them. Likewise we no longer whitelist things...they get allowlisted or permitlisted. We don't have white-hat/black-hat hackers...we have defensive/offensive, or blue-team/red-team.

Afaik it's still okay to refer to plugs and prongs as female and male, as that is referring to biological sex moreso than gender. But yet, people gasp when I refer to plugs that have a sheath over them as "uncircumcised".

[–] Tonava@sopuli.xyz 1 points 11 hours ago

Aahhh, yes of course, the classic white-good evil-black problem. Thanks for the answer!