this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
13 points (88.2% liked)

Star Wars

6204 readers
2 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.

  5. Posts must be coherent.

  6. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Doesn't that create a huge vulnerability in that the enemy can just go under the ship and shoot up? Seems like they could have at least put 1 or 2 on the underside.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jozav@lemmy.world 6 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

"up" and "under" have no meaning in space.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 6 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, but George didn't really get that at the time... At least not with the big ships.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

My point exacly. But, I'm talking the side opposite the bridge.

Also, Star Wars ships had a general up/down in that they had micro-gravity that was generally oriented with the bridge at the top

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

So you mean the dorsal (bridge) side, as opposed to the ventral (under) side?

ISDs do have turbo lasers on the underside. They are often seen using them for planetary bombardment.