this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2026
13 points (88.2% liked)

Star Wars

6204 readers
2 users here now

Discussion for all things Star Wars. Movies, books, games, TV shows and more are welcome.

  1. Keep it civil. Don’t insult other community members in posts or comments, and don’t make posts designed to insult other community members or parts of the fandom with different opinions.

  2. Posts must be on-topic.

  3. No real life politics. That means no political advocacy, and no real life political discussions vaguely dressed up as on-topic posts. If you want to discuss real life politics, you are free to start your own community.

  4. No memes/low-effort spam/Youtube poops style posts. !starwarsmemes@lemmy.world is a place for those.

  5. Posts must be coherent.

  6. If a post is otherwise allowed but has realistic gore or nudity, please mark it NSFW.

Community icon art from DeviantArt user DavidDeb.

Banner art by Ralph McQuarrie.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Doesn't that create a huge vulnerability in that the enemy can just go under the ship and shoot up? Seems like they could have at least put 1 or 2 on the underside.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Right but, if I were captaining a Mon Cala cruiser, I’d position my ship with my main guns towards the hangar side and where their main batteries couldn’t hit me because I was on the othef side of the ship.

I just noticed that you mean the Quad Turbo lasers, the big guns on the top side. Turbolaser are the general combat armaments. Those are quite evenly spread around the ISDs, both above, below and in the “trenches” along their sides, and used for shooting at anything, Asteroids, fighters, ships. The Quad Turbolasers were the heavy armaments they’d use on long range stand-off/line fighting. Usually ships started combat out of range and then moved closer, so getting below the ship without it noticing or rotating was hard, especially so for a ship of the MC-series.

For the fighters/bombers, the enemy ships have their own escorts of X and Y wings too.

That’s also what the turbolasers are for. And the TIEs

But, Venators? They were extra weak on their underside because the hangar to launch fighters was up at the top along the length of the ship

I am not sure this is the case. In Clone Wars we saw a Venator using its underside to shield the top side and hangar against a blockade of Munificent cruisers. While they did most likely angle their shields their as well, it would hardly make sense to even do if the underside was specifically weak.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I just noticed that you mean the Quad Turbo lasers, the big guns on the top side.

Right! The really really big ones. I though they were the turbos and the smaller ones werd just turrets of some sort. My bad!

While they did most likely angle their shields their as well, it would hardly make sense to even do if the underside was specifically weak.

Right, but the shielding is the key word. I wasn't saying it was weak in that it couldn't have an inventive use. I meant weak in that it had less offensive capabilities for a line fight like at the start of III. I mean, you could eventually cut someone in half with individual sheets of paper doing paper cuts over and over. But using a saw would be more practical.

[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Right! The really really big ones. I though they were the turbos and the smaller ones werd just turrets of some sort. My bad!

No worries, the normal turbo laser turrets are relatively small compared to the Quads and especially to the size of an ISD.

Right, but the shielding is the key word. I wasn't saying it was weak in that it couldn't have an inventive use. I meant weak in that it had less offensive capabilities for a line fight like at the start of III. I mean, you could eventually cut someone in half with individual sheets of paper doing paper cuts over and over. But using a saw would be more practical.

That's true, though in that case you move away. Unless both ships have the exact same speed and heading, they'd diverge relatively quickly. Line fighting usually involves constant movement. So unloading a broadside or two probably doesn't do that much.

Oh, and I just had a quick look at the fight. So apparently the Venators have a big death laser around the lower hangar section. At minute 2:50 it is used to blast a Munificent apart. It might very well be, that it is the same type of weapon used by the Empire for Planetary Bombardments, or purpose built for the Clone Wars.

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

So apparently the Venators have a big death laser around the lower hangar section. At minute 2:50 it is used to blast a Munificent apart.

The only time I remember seeing a giant gun out the bottom of the capital ship was in the sequels where a Sith Star Destroyer had a miniature Death Star cannon that was used to destroy a plannet. So, forgive me for asking, but what episode are you talking about that 2:50 mark?

[–] Akagigahara@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Episode 3, during the Space Battle over Coruscant

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Oh Right! Its right at the 1:00 mark (film footage time, not including introductory text).

Well, it was more just a weird laser beam (didn't actually see a cannon barrel), but I'll give it to you.