this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
673 points (99.1% liked)

politics

29594 readers
2643 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A pair of progressive Democrats unveiled a bill on Tuesday that would raise the federal minimum wage to $25 per hour, considered the bare minimum a single adult needs to meet the cost of living in much of the US.

The Living Wage For All Act is the first bill to be introduced by the newly sworn-in Rep. Analilia Mejía (D-NJ), who won a special election earlier this month after helping to lead the fight for a $15 minimum wage in her home state of New Jersey.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Etterra@discuss.online 101 points 2 days ago (9 children)

These idiots need to stop setting the minimum wage to fixed values, and set them to calculations based off GDP and localized (by county) cost of living, with an annual (or better yet quarterly) refresh on the calculation. Maybe some other variables, I'm not an economist, but the point is to have it adjust without needing constant legislative flights.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Fuck, they could agree to recalculate every decade and it would still be an improvement.

[–] discocactus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I mean it's almost like since the concept was invented we developed a way of collecting and storing information in a way where it could be constantly updated and then used as input for algorithms and math on demand, continuously.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 days ago

I mean taxes and fees are a percentages as well, why would a minimum wage be a fixed amount. Changing circumstances, regionality and inflation are not new concepts for lawmakers. A fixed $25 is actually not a great idea, but I get it's better than status quo.

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It should be tied to congress's salary. Every time they give themselves a pay rise, minimum wage increases proportionally. Also healthcare and pensions.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s cute you think a Congressperson makes money from their salary

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They do make a salary and they often do vote to increase it. So their comment still makes sense.

Their other unethical to illegal money making strategies are irrelevant to what was said about minimum wage, but it'd be nice if we did something about all the insider trading and bribery

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 3 points 2 days ago

often do vote to increase it.

Congressional salary has been the same for the last 18 years.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 5 points 2 days ago

Congress hasn't had a raise since 2009.

Most of them are independently wealthy and/or get their money from insider trading instead.

[–] Doublenut@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 days ago

The comment above yours laid out the details in this bill which include automatic increases adjusting with the median national income. I think that's about as good as it could get coming from the federal government You could loby your local/ state government for additional adjustments based on COL, something i could see happening in NY, California or other high COL places. At least I could have seen in the pre-weasel reality, but who knows on this hellsphere.

[–] Tetragrade@leminal.space 9 points 2 days ago

Nah mate that has a chance of working, can't have that.

[–] rounding_error@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

inb4 gop uses this calculation to set the minimum wage to like $10

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 days ago

Still would be a raise for some places.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

County could get far too complex. By state would be fine. If counties had a set size or population that would be more reasonable, but they don't. In some states you can easily drive 3 counties over for a daily commute. In others it can take over an hour to drive out of 1 county. That alone will create inequities

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Or just abolish the wage system.

Make it illegal to pay a wage. Instead make it a calculation based on the company's profits, split evenly by all employees.

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Question. If you were a capitalist running small or medium company how would you adapt to that paradigm?

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 2 days ago

Call a meeting with the workers to discuss the company's finances, and then ask them to vote.

[–] crwth@piefed.zip 6 points 2 days ago

If you indexed minwage to the local affordable housing costs, there might be more interest in building some.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Unfortunately Federal minimum wage is not going to do locality calculations, that has to come down to locality or state intervention. And thats not discounting the fact that a federal minimum is obviously going to have a direct hand in blanket changes