this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
601 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

84623 readers
5950 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 97 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They don't care. They only care about short term profits. Capitalism only cares about immediate profits and doesn't plan for the long term. The management at the top know they won't be there when the system fails. They'll get their massive paycheques and cash out their stock long before it crashes.

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 41 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They can't care. If they don't relentlessly pursue profit quarter after quarter, they'll be consumed by companies who will. There is no planning for the future, only profits.

[–] BigJohnnyHines@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 week ago

Also the system selects for mental illness so a lot of the worst offenders here literally can’t feel empathy.

[–] Live_your_lives@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Wasn't Amazon's whole thing for a while that they weren't going to relentlessly pursue quarterly profits? So they can care, they just often don't.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

Companies can bleed ridiculous amounts of money if it means that they can push competition out of the market. Couple less profitable, or even negative, quarters are fine, if they're expecting good enough return for that investment. So, they're still firmly on track with maximum profit hunting, sometimes it just takes some money to make even more money.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Walmart used to, probably still does, use other stores as welfare generators for newer stores. The reason was/is because that means the new store can undercut all local competition long enough to drive them out of business and the jack the prices afterwards. Corporations focused so heavily on lying, cheating, and stealing do not do anything out of the good ess of their hearts.

[–] bridgeburner@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Funny thing, Walmart tried to do exactly that when they were trying to get a foothold in germany, but failed massively, lol.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

see The People's Republic of Walmart

[–] ferrule@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 week ago

I worked in the energy industry for over a decade and a half and I was amazed at how every CEO we had (because they rotated out every couple of years) seemed to only pick the actions that made stort term money while royally screwing over the next CEO's tenure. And the crazy part was everyone knew this was happening. Some CEOs even stated the quiet part out loud.