this post was submitted on 02 May 2026
595 points (99.0% liked)
Technology
84359 readers
4443 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
So I've been utilizing the big LLMs to help increase my productivity at work. And I have to say, yes, it absolutely makes me more productive.
However, I can only be more productive because I already have 25 years of experience in my field and I am already a senior and I can guide the "AI" to what I really need help with and I can see the mistakes it makes.
There is absolutely no way someone who hasn't already been doing this job for 25 years would be able to just sit down with an AI assistant and replace me.
And my company has not hired any associate level employees who could replace me. All my peers are 5-7 years away from retirement. I'm 11 years away from retirement.
The problem is that it doesn't matter how useful and irreplaceable you know you are, if a company decides it's replacing you with AI, they'll do it anyway. They may decide later that they were wrong, and you were right, but it doesn't matter, you're still unemployed.
Companies shoot themselves in the foot all the time. You can't count on them to do the smart thing, even if it's obvious. The second some C-Level gets these the idea that they can save money by firing a bunch of people, it's going to happen, no matter how ill-advised.
Yeah LLM is a useful idiot that somehow read all the programming books. It can spit out a coherent sentence yet it doesn’t understand it. Comprehension is left to the user. It’s an advanced rubber duck
All a LLM gives you is three virtual interns in an expert's trenchcoat.
I just started messing with making a server, I’ve never done it before, never really wrote code before except an Arduino blinking light. I don’t think I would have gotten the server done, at least as well or as quickly without an llm. That said, even I notice it fucking up a lot and losing the plot.
I have found it really useful in identifying useful stuff in scrap piles, one of my hobbies is scrounging so that’s been good.
I had a manager tell the team that an LLM said we should be able to do a technical task so we should look into that.
I died a little inside.
I also use it, but exactly I know what I am looking for and what is BS...
I have similar experience. LLM is about as good as Google was before enshittification. All it does it replaces 10 minutes of me searching for the correct piece of documentation with 2~3 minutes of using LLM to grab the same information.
Intern could find it for me in an hour, two if he used LLM since AI works much better with jargon.