this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
2226 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

73496 readers
5368 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

First RCS now this, today has been wild

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 47 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Once steam covers 90% of games windows becomes irrelevant.

[–] atthecoast@feddit.nl 41 points 2 years ago (5 children)

So what you’re saying is, 2024 will be the year of Linux on the desktop?

[–] skulkingaround@sh.itjust.works 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I know that phrase is the most beaten dead horse around at this point but the year of the Linux desktop is going to be different depending on what your requirements are.

If you just need to browse the web, it's been there for over a decade. Same for most dev work.

For gaming, it's already there for most titles. Pretty much everything I try works now unless it has anticheat. It's been in a pretty good state for 2 or 3 years now at least.

For media creation and specialized software, it's not there yet. The big stuff like adobe will probably never get ported and the free alternatives vary wildly in quality. Blender is awesome. GIMP is not. There's also issues like lacking color management and iffy HDR support.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I do wonder about that, Gen Z and Alpha are less tech savvy than millennials, so there's non zero odds that it doesn't work out because Linux isn't easily accessible in the tablet/phone space yet.

And no android doesn't count

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

They are also less wealthy than X and millennial were at first computer purchase age. GNU/Linux is cheap

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The OS is but the hardware ya gotta install it on could be another story, especially with gaming distros becoming more and more common

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Sure for gaming you want a pretty expensive machine, but for a user who wants web and email a used low end laptop will perform great

[–] gh0stcassette@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 years ago

Mobile Linux is a thing, though I think it would take governments mandating unlocked/user-unlockable bootloaders to gain literally Any market share. It would also probably take a compatibility layer for running Android apps similar to Wine in desktop Linux, but Android already runs a Linux kernel, so projects like Waydroid are most of the way there already by just running Android inside a container.

[–] HW07@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think we need rock-solid Wayland before we can expect TYLD. So I'm feeling 2026 minimum, then add a couple for some padding; so 2028 realistically. Think of how far we've come in 5 years, then imagine 5 years more.

If Nvidia's consumer GPU market share dropped a bit too, that'd help.

[–] frostinger@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why do you think that Wayland is necessary for adoption? In my opinion it is the missing hardware drivers, compatability issues and "getting your hands dirty" while constantly tweaking stuff. Yeah it got better over the years, but most people want things to just work.

[–] HW07@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Wayland is necessary because Wayland will be necessary in the near future, if it was next year then that would put a lot of people who don't know about X.Org and Wayland through a major shift which could rock-the-boat a bit too much and cause them to go back to Windows for the "just works" experience.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago

Look, I just finally tried steam on Linux and the game booted up. I am absolutely amazed as I thought I'd never see that day. Also windows is somehow just getting worse and worse. It's like they just want an entire ad platform. They lost me at this point. I have 0 need for any ms products again and that's a great feeling.

[–] frostinger@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

but WHY is it necessary??

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 years ago

But which distro though?

[–] Matombo@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago

yes he did and if it doesn't happen we can shame him for all eternety, but i'm right with you there buddy: 2024 lets gooooooo!

[–] sederx@programming.dev 6 points 2 years ago

it already is irrelevant for many people

[–] Giooschi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As long as many important games fall into that 10% many gamers won't consider Linux.

Not to mention Adobe/Office/CAD suites that will prevent others from switching.

And finally most pcs are sold with windows preinstalled and the vast majority of people don't even know that other OS even exist.

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 1 points 2 years ago

Also a lot of high end medical equipment. Some stuff will only work/communicate with Windows XP, even today, for instance.

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (3 children)

For gamers-only maybe lmao

E: and people willing to spend several hours a month wondering why their OS broke again

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If you don't tinker like the usual Linux user your os won't break more often than windows

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Explain that to my Ubuntu install that killed itself over a package dependency no longer existing in the repo.

[–] Johanno@feddit.de -1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

As I said, not more often than windows

[–] kadu@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

A normal software installation never broke a Windows install in my life.

[–] Sheeple@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Yeah people often forget the sheer amount of quality checks and testing that windows updates go through. Sure it might do annoying things like changing your default browser but it never truly breaks.

There's also the fact that Windows native antivirus is so good that installing antivirus software is actually a downgrade. On Linux meanwhile you gotta run third party antivirus.

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Windows updates break my clock... Idk about this claim that it doesn't break stuff.

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This comment is a prime example of a drowning man trying to pull up by the straw

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I don't follow... And that's not an actual expression

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In my experience windows just breaks as often. Depending on hardware and software used.

Yes it might be better for windows 11 I haven't run that yet. And windows 10 almost never broke either so it is maybe better now

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It literally almost never happens for windows yet Linux is generally most famous by this one thing

[–] Johanno@feddit.de 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It should not happen if you use debian, Ubuntu or Mint stable. As long you don't do anything exotic it should not break, at not since 2018.

And if it breaks remember you compare free software made by volunteers (and paid employees from companies) with much less money and they still manage to compete with the multi billion dollar company Microsoft.

[–] baked_tea@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
  1. It was on ~~Ubuntu~~ Debian

  2. Is exactly what I'm trying to say.. this is why Linux will not be ever better unless it is an actual product that can have real money poured into it. Except they don't really "manage to compete". Unless you count 1vs99 as non-laughable competition. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to use something else but as of right now, nothing can really compare with stability and being "plug and play"

[–] psud@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Hmm. My partner's Linux machine is perfectly stable and has been for a decade. I administer it for them, but that's just running updates and distribution upgrades every now and then

My server takes more effort, as distribution upgrades sometimes break stuff, for example the mailing list manager I have used for a long time became deprecated and was disabled on the recent LTS upgrade

My laptop running Ubuntu from the factory is perfectly fine, I'll probably make it less stable by moving it to Debian

[–] Djtecha@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

If you stick to Ubuntu you usually don't have that problem IMHO.