this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
166 points (95.6% liked)

Cybersecurity

9939 readers
155 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Community Rules

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !securitynews@infosec.pub !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub

Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wouldn't biometric data be sensor/implementation specific. I doubt the fingerprint data stored on an iPhone is the same as the one stored on an Xperia.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Your fingerprint is your fingerprint. If its possible to extract the raw data, then that can be reconstructed into your fingerprint...

[–] BorgDrone@feddit.nl 1 points 21 hours ago

Fingerprint readers don’t store a raw copy of your fingerprint, to use a bad analogy: it’s like a biometric hash.

[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.today 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

in the early 2000s when fingerprint readers started getting popular, my coworker and I decided to test them...

super glue fumes, printer toner and scotch tape. that's all that was ever needed to bypass the reader once you could isolate a good spot where someones finger left a good mark. like from drinking glass or a door knob

I'm not sure if I'd ever trust a fingerprint to fully be a secure passkey

[–] tgxn@lemmy.tgxn.net 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I would not trust it as a single factor, but 2FA should always be something you have+something you know, biometeics is more of a "something you ARE", which is unchangeable.

[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Also I hear you can be compelled by the police to unlock biometric locks.

[–] kn33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

That's the thing - it's not possible. The fingerprint is only ever stored within the fingerprint module, with no method for retrieval. The only thing the phone sees is "did this person scan a matching fingerprint or not?"

[–] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't think that means it cannot be leaked

[–] UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, but what would you do with it? Can you convert the bytes to work on any other sensor the victim may also use their fingerprint? Never looked into the real implementation details of the fingerprint hardware.

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

Sometimes you can. Or just bruteforce a colliding pattern that matches to print that instead, because why not