Technology

42905 readers

165 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

alyaza@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@beehaw.org

gyrfalcon@beehaw.org

rs5th@beehaw.org

SemioticStandard@beehaw.org

TheRtRevKaiser@kbin.social

coldredlight@beehaw.org

remington@beehaw.org

AI layoffs backfire as cutting staff doesn't cut it, firms warned (www.theregister.com)

submitted 1 day ago by Powderhorn@beehaw.org to c/technology@beehaw.org

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Bosses betting on AI to slash headcount and boost margins are discovering an uncomfortable truth: the strategy isn't working.

New research from Gartner lays out the problem in stark terms. The analyst firm surveyed 350 global businesses - all with annual revenues above $1 billion, all piloting or deploying intelligent automation - and found that around 80 percent had cut staff as a result.

The returns? Elusive. Companies that reduced their workforces were just as likely to see negative outcomes or marginal gains as they were to generate any meaningful return on investment (ROI).

The conclusion? Layoffs don't create returns, they just create vacancies.

"Many CEOs turn to layoffs to demonstrate quick AI returns; however, this disposition is misplaced," said distinguished VP analyst Helen Poitevin and lead researcher on the study. "Workforce reductions may create budget room, but they do not create return. Organizations that improve ROI are not those that eliminate the need for people, but those that amplify them," she added.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] bl4kers@beehaw.org 19 points 1 day ago (2 children)

LLM prices will continue to rise and they'll be stuck holding the bag

[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is the part I’m waiting to see. My prediction; once AI providers have other companies by the nuts watch them hike prices and then we’ll hear CEO’s squealing about the unfairness of it even though they were the ones calling the shots.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 3 points 13 hours ago

It's going to be bad, too. These companies are repportedly selling tokens for 1/10 - 1/15 the actual processing costs. Companies are already spending significantly more than they would junior developers (to generate an un-revewable amount of code). Raising peices by a factor of 20 will kill the whole project dead. They'll need to hold out until there's no one left who knows how to write anymore to survive that kind of price hike.

[–] Kichae@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago

Yup. And costs right now are rising while they're still in the "get everybody hooked" stage of things, in no small part because they can't survive at current prices. Anthropic is desperate to get to their IPO so they can have the warchest they need to actually become an established integral part of development pipelines and not just a fad.