this post was submitted on 08 May 2026
383 points (98.5% liked)
Technology
84463 readers
4299 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Grok, undress her, render this entire scene as if she had no clothes.... or was only wearing cellophane, whatever.
... Its still wild to me that people will do something like that, when you can literally just go to a strip club and look, or look at the vast, uncountable amount of erotica or porn that people freely post of themselves.
... Oh dear god.
Somebody is going to wear these things into a strip club and sell it like a fucking virtu in cyberpunk 77.
That's because it's not about the nudity or the sexual gratification. It's about humiliating another person. It gives certain people a sense of power and they find that euphoric. And for those who watch these videos, well voyeurism is a thing.
Yeah, my only quibble would be that for the violators, well, they do get off on power tripping, being able to fuck with other people in ways that they cannot prevent or stymie.
Its basically the rapist/groomer type of mindset.
So it does end up being sexual, but basically via extra steps.
But yes... its fucked up either way, also fucked up as a potential business model.
POV porn exists, you could just actually work out an agreement with a strip club to basically rent it out to do a shoot one day, if you wanted to end up with pretty much the same kind of video, except everyone involved actually signed up for it.
But that's kind of the point. They want people who didn't "sign up for it". That's part of the allure for these people. And for the viewer side as well. I have literally watched people angrily debate that a video depicting such things was "faked" and that counted as a negative for the people who watch those. I honestly don't get what the difference is between a person who's getting a paycheck and somebody who's being stalked and fucked with for somebody who's watching that sort of content. But sadly they exist in far too large numbers.
I mean... yeah.
IMO, those are the kind of people who should be on a list... not trans people who would like to be able to use a public bathroom.
But, we live in a world where apparently 40% of cops with access to camera networks that track liscense plate movement, use that to stalk their exes.
I'd imagine strip clubs are going to be one of the few places you won't see these things. They don't want private videos of inside their establishment, and they aren't a 'public' place so they can refuse to let you in with them.
I don't know if you've been to a American strip club.
Rules often tend to be more like 'guidelines', that don't actually exist as long as you appear to be following them, appear to understand the concept of plausible deniability, and/or are throwing around enough money to make people look the other way.
Pay the cover, play it cool, don't ask stupid questions, don't get caught?
I can absolutely see this happening.