this post was submitted on 09 May 2026
975 points (97.3% liked)

politics

29705 readers
2784 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"What’s funny about that is they assume my ambition is positional. They assume my ambition is a title or a seat. My ambition is way bigger than that. My ambition is to change this country. Presidents come and go, elected officials come and go, single payer healthcare is forever."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 158 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (7 children)

Bernie is 84 years old.

I am a huge fan of Bernie. Have been for over a decade. He is too old to be the president.

[–] ZMoney@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The point of Bernie or AOC or Zohran or any socialist candidate is the movement behind them, which represents the will of the masses. The actual figurehead is largely irrelevant because everything they do is in the interest of their constituents. They might use their charisma to win (but usually it's the movement that actually wins the campaign), but once they're in power they just have to fulfill their promises, and they have staff to do this.

A regular politician, by contrast, enacts the will of the corporate class. In this way they're mostly irrelevant too.

[–] Freeposity@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Bernie or AOC or Zohran

Or Kat Abughazaleh. If you don't know her yet, you should look her up.

[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 103 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Shouldn't be getting downvotes for this. Bernie deserves to rest, he's been saying the same message for decades and it's up to us to make it better for him, now.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 61 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He would be more valuable as an advisor.

Less energy wasted on the bullshit.

Exactly. He’d make a wonderful cabinet member or top advisor.

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If Bernie wants to rest, then he can rest.

He isn't acting like a man that wants to rest.

[–] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's also incredibly sharp for 84....but he's 84...

He'll be 86 at the next election.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 day ago

And 90 by the time he is out of office, at least.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As president you get way more stress, more travel, less sleep. He wouldn't do well in the president's office.

[–] TachyonTele@piefed.social 12 points 1 day ago

Yeah his opening came and gone, unfortunately. Time doesn't care, it marches on.

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's the same thing everybody said last time and Bernie is in better physical, mental, and psychological condition than Trump.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 34 points 1 day ago

better physical, mental, and psychological condition than Trump.

That bar is so low I'd need to dig a hole to find it.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Of course, and because of that he would never win an election, because people won't vote for him because "he's too old". Like I said, I don't care about his age, or that he would likely die in office, perhaps even in the first year. I'd still vote for him, because I agree with him, and I want his ideas in that office. That's why he'd need a good V.P. I don't understand why anyone would care how old he is, as long as they agree with him. Is it because he would probably die in office? Why does that matter?

I don't care about Trump's age per se, I do care that he's got dementia. Bernie doesn't have dementia.

Anyway, it's a pipe dream, and I'll happily vote for one of his protégés, too.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

More importantly, he's too old, and not aggressive enough, to win. We need someone that knows how to build and run a political machine, that can seize control of the party and purge the old guard. A true populist that can play a crowd. Bernie unfortunately lacks the killer instinct to overcome the establishment.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bernie for president and AOC for vice president? That'd be something.

IF he died in office, the position likely would be taken good care of