It became the only reliable source of information I had. People posted links with a minimal amount of commentary, picking and choosing the best content from other social media networks. They’re not doing it to “build a brand” because that’s not a thing in the Fediverse. It’s too disjointed to be a place to build a newsletter subscription base.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] tristynalxander@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

Apologies, I think we are talking past each other. I think I misunderstood your initial comment. It read like a suggestion that lemmy's more extreme communities were terroristic and a criticism of the first amendment, which suggested that you believe the government should be allowed to dictate what kind of speech is or isn't acceptable -- in particular on these little platforms. My comment was in response to that notion.

Re-reading it with your second comment, I think you're saying that "terrorist ideologies" have been allowed to develop on conventional social-media by claiming first amendment protections in order to not moderate communities, and 2016 was not in reference to early lemmy but to the MAGA movement. That makes more sense, and I generally agree that conventional social-media follows irresponsible stewardship practices.