this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
283 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

59109 readers
1269 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

  7. No low-effort posts. This is subjective and will largely be determined by the community member reports.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lots of layoffs ("re-evaluating our operational footprint") and switching to "agentic" processes. Target user is AI.

Anyone still hosting Gitlab?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] oce@jlai.lu 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Will it be possible to have decentralized pull requests? Like I open a PR on my site, my friend reviews my PR on his site, and I get his reviews on my site?

[–] Anafabula@discuss.tchncs.de 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's the plan, but it's still far away

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 day ago
[–] ballmerpeaking@programming.dev 9 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

This was always baked into basic git from the beginning if you review your code in E-Mail chains or mailing lists.

[–] null@piefed.nullspace.lol 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

So not really baked in at all then?

[–] iltg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago

why wouldn't it be? you can send emails from web uis too. you can share diffs however you desire. you can have a remote for each developer, and push/pull changes to each other. the github mindset kind of ruined the resilience and distributedness of git: one central remote, one account authority, one central place where discussing MRs... ever forgejo is not as good as decentralized git: what's a forgejo identity?

meanwhile git has been decentralized and distributed since day one, linux is still developed in a decentralized and distributed way and forgepub is just not ready and not even close.

sending emails with an attached diff to many ppl is too hard? make a nice offline gui doing that and we're distributed. github was a psyop to make us un-learn git, making it better is silly, like wasting decades searching for "good cigarettes"

[–] cecilkorik@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago

Email chains and mailing lists are not really a practical way to develop anymore, and it is increasingly anachronistic (as is the idea of tying your identity to an email which is also baked into basic git). This was the only realistic democratic and federated option when git was designed, but it was never the ideal one. Forgejo is trying to build a better, more ideal, also-federated alternative that is really designed for code collaboration from the ground up. Once the design is stabilized, there's no reason it couldn't get built into git also. I would love to be able to create a PR with git itself and have it automatically submitted to the origin repository.

[–] oce@jlai.lu 1 points 19 hours ago

That's nowhere near as convenient as current web based PR.