Mildly Infuriating
Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world
I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!
It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.
Rules:
1. Be Respectful
Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.
Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.
...
2. No Illegal Content
Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.
That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals
-No CSA content or Revenge Porn
-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)
...
3. No Spam
Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.
-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.
-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.
-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers
-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.
...
4. No Porn/Explicit
Content
-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.
-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.
...
5. No Enciting Harassment,
Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts
-Do not Brigade other Communities
-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.
-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.
-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.
...
6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.
-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.
...
7. Content should match the theme of this community.
-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.
-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.
...
8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body
-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.
...
...
Also check out:
Partnered Communities:
Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.
All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.
view the rest of the comments
If this were true they wouldn't have enacted any legislation at all (which was the status quo before this). The next step should be to use the data gained from ticketing these robot taxis to determine the rate of infraction and hold the the company accountable when that legislation is ready. I. E. Corp has broken the law X number of times and each infraction equals a penalty, x number of penalties means revoking of license to operate robot taxi service in state etc.
We all know that fining corps isn't something that actually works because they just consider it part of their operating cost, so the goal should be to prevent them from operating altogether if their product can't adhere to traffic laws.
Also, I think perhaps it might be worth it to license these vehicles differently. A commercial license of some kind because individuals can't be held accountable (because either the people operating them or observing them aren't in the same country, or because there isn't a vehicle operator at all).
That's just laziness. There are individuals who can be held accountable.
Starting with the executives who signed off on these things being put on the road in the first place.
Forgive me, that wasn't the complete thought I assumed it was.
What I mean is that Liability in business is often spread across the company as an entity because there are usually a lot of people involved in the decision tree that leads to things like this.
You'd be holding more than one person liable if you were holding people liable at all. And generally if one person can be pointed to as at fault they are "the fall guy", taking the brunt of whatever consequences so that the company doesn't have to. Rarely do you get both options.
I didn't mean to imply that the people who are involved couldn't be held accountable.
They're currently breaking the law and not being held accountable. The threat of eventually being held accountable is a step in the right direction, but the only reason they're able to do this right now is due to money.
The fact that they weren't being ticketed before means that we don't even really know how bad these cars are, and yet they've been allowed to stay on roads with pedestrians and other cars.
Not exactly. They were breaking the law and not being held accountable. Now they're being held accountable but how they are being held to account is problematic and toothless. That's not the same thing and it's exactly what my comment was trying to highlight. There are ways that the law can progress to be more effective.
Needing to report incidents isn't being held accountable. They're not facing any consequences for breaking the law.
Think about how laws and legislation evolve over time.
Some legislation has a habit of giving the perpetrators who violate it enough rope to hang themselves. That's why I laid out what I said to include other steps they could take to amend or update the legislation.
A ban on self driving vehicles would be better, and we already know that Musk among others has been throwing money at keeping that from happening for ages.
Either way, if you can tell me why they'd bother to allow them to be ticketed rather than just not doing that like they already weren't, I'd love to be enlightened.
The problem comes to who’s at fault?
Is it the passenger riding? The car itself? The company that programmed it? The owner?
Personally, I agree, robotaxis should be yeeted out of existence if they can’t abide traffic laws- but a lot of them are being operated privately too.
They should’ve not been permitted at all until these questions were answered, and corporations should not have been allowed to comment.
I mean, it's obviously the company. The issue is the government doesn't want to actually legislate and determine how you address issues where there is prison time and or licenses get revoked.
Its also not a problem, it's an abdication of responsibility. Either the government needs to take a stance or the cars shouldn't be on the road. Seems like instead the government is willing to risk our safety rather than take any firm stance.
Companies should get fined a minimum of 1% of gross profits per infraction
I don't disagree. As the operator of the vehicle you as a regular person would be at held at fault. A commercially licensed driver would be held at fault and in some cases the company is held at fault depending on the infraction and their policy.
When a machine doesn't operate within the confines of the law, the fact is the company who owns and operates the machine is liable. So that's who should be held at fault.