politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
Here's an article on what I'm talking about
If they aren't shown and it's normalized that a candidate can garner just as much political support then it's a headwind...
There's also the belief I'm talking about where people say a woman can't win, which becomes a self fulfilling prophecy. It also comes down to advertising and education (which are hamstrung by mudslinging during elections)
There are a lot of studies like this. I could go on for quite a while.
There's also a double bind racial bias where black female candidates are viewed as highly competent but unsuitable for a general election.
These issues need to be:
A) recognized as real.
B) dealt with through education and normalization.
Ironically your style of comment is undermining A and B by saying none of this is real, and shutting down any conversation about potentially fixing it...
And trump was shown as losing every election in the polls.
There are lies, damn lies, and statistics. Studies about about how people think other people will feel from 500 people on Amazon's slave labor website falls distinctly in the third category.
Humans are silly apes looking for purpose and answers and we get what we put out. And for some reason when women run they seem to win at the same rate as men. Almost like it can't be simplified to math about racial disparity.
Next you can pull out some calipers and talk about how head size correlates to evolution and superiority, but you are only doing it cause someone else offered to separate them out for you. Nah, I'm done hearing you excuse away your original line of "well shes a black woman so its basically impossible for her to win"
Yeah you're right it's not an issue that needs to be identified and educated to the general population. We'll just run a candidate again and act surprised when she loses despite the polling we're getting saying she's going to win...
If you won't accept Standford as a source tell me in advance what sources you accept and I bet I can find studies from that institution as well supporting my argument...
Edit:
This feels like:
"Here are sources proving people don't change their mind when presented with sources to foundationally back up a claim they don't agree with"
"I don't believe that"
And there it is again. "Run a woman of color and we should all pack it in now cause she will lose." No effort, no nuance. Just obvious to you and all the racists and sexists you "dont" agree with wink.
You dont have polls or actual data on this, you have guesses thrown into the night and cherry picked to make a point from endless data we collect. I can find someone that agrees with me that the sky is a painting, it doesnt mean we can't send someone up to try to touch it, and you saying it shouldn't even be tried is against everything humans are for. Effort and against the odds trying.
Its gross. You can deal with that. I'm out.
If you read my sources (and my previous comments, "as per my last email") a lot of these biases and headwinds disappear with education. As stupid as it sounds, just running an ad going "a black female candidate can garner just as much political support as a white male candidate" can have a strong effect in her campaign.
The core disagreement I think we're having is whether or not this should even be identified as an issue. I believe it should be as per my previous comments.
as far as I can tell, you don't think it's an issue and shouldn't be contented in an election
You want to prove you mean that it just takes education, delete your original comment that says a woman if color just can't get people to vote for her. Otherwise it still looks like you are trying to argue you have moral justification for stepping on the throats of others when admonishing their attempts at more.
I edited my original comment to append info to clarify. Deleting it would remove an important part of this whole conversation I think.
What a joke. Ha ha.