this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
472 points (94.7% liked)

News

22903 readers
3954 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, I wrote a great deal about the rise of “ventilation shutdown plus” (VSD+), a method being used to mass kill poultry birds on factory farms by sealing off the airflow inside barns and pumping in extreme heat using industrial-scale heaters, so that the animals die of heatstroke over the course of hours. It is one of the worst forms of cruelty being inflicted on animals in the US food system — the equivalent of roasting animals to death — and it’s been used to kill tens of millions of poultry birds during the current avian flu outbreak.

As of this summer, the most recent period for which data is available, more than 49 million birds, or over 80 percent of the depopulated total, were killed in culls that used VSD+ either alone or in combination with other methods, according to an analysis of USDA data by Gwendolen Reyes-Illg, a veterinary adviser to the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), an animal advocacy nonprofit. These mass killings, or “depopulations,” in the industry’s jargon, are paid for with public dollars through a USDA program that compensates livestock farmers for their losses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 117 points 10 months ago (8 children)

Just pump nitrogen in the sealed pens. The animal doesn’t panic due to perceived oxygen deprivation. They just get sleepy and die.

Hell it would be the way I’d want to go if I was sick with terminal cancer. Cheap, easy, and painless.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 62 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I imagine that would be pretty difficult to do in a chicken coop. These are barns made out of corrugated steel and generally aren't even remotely air tight. You will, ultimately, need about 10x the nitrogen you would otherwise need, and that's if it even works.

So a special coop would need to be built for this purpose.

Chicken farmers are some of the poorest farmers in the country. They generally don't have the means to build a special kill shed to humanely euthanize their flock. They barely have the means to keep up with Tyson and Perdue's ridiculous bullshit.

So, while I agree, heat stroke is a fucking awful way to kill these animals, the issue isn't just "there's a humane method bro, just build a kill house bro"

The issue is, we are paying FAR too little for chicken, and most meat, honestly.

[–] Szymon@lemmy.ca 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If you have millions of chickens to kill, you're not so poor of a farmer that be you can't afford to come up with a humane method to do this job.

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 52 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

There are several documentaries on this topic, but they don't have a lot of authority over how many chickens they buy. They're dictated a flock size, they pay for it, and then they pay to feed and raise them, then they sell them back to the people they bought the chicks from. Inevitably every year the chicken processor, whoever it may be, makes additional demands that they also have to pay out of pocket for.

I'm not justifying their actions, I'm saying they are stuck between two masters and they have no room to wiggle.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Out of complete ignorance - do Purdue or Tyson even run their own hatcheries/coops?

[–] Kepabar@startrek.website 37 points 10 months ago (2 children)

No.

It's cheaper to out source it this way because as their farmers are contractors they don't have to adhere to the legal responsibilities they would if they ran them in their own.

They can keep their contracted farmers in debt to them indefinitely and essentially have a class of indentured servants.

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I have learned more in this discussion about chicken farming than I ever thought I would.

Sometimes I just love the internet.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 10 months ago

Welcome to the Internet, come and take a seat.

[–] ohitsbreadley@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 10 months ago

I thought that was the case. They probably own the IP rights to the breed too, so they keep the money circulating within their own pockets

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

You’re not wrong and nuance is often the bane of rationality. I didn’t say it was an easy solution just a more humane one.

[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why would anyone get into chicken farming if it makes you one of the poorest farmers in the country? Are they stupid?

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago

Why do people work fast food jobs if they don't pay a living wage?

You're blaming the poor for being poor. If you care so strongly about this, you should start financially supporting poultry farmers to change vocations.

[–] GiuseppeAndTheYeti@midwest.social 6 points 10 months ago

They probably don't have the land needed for beef or pork would be my guess.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 45 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I imagine there are a handful of ways to do it besides “long, slow heat stroke”

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

I imagine the long, slow, painful, heat stroke method is the cheapest, thus the suffering is capitalist-approved!

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

We are getting that heat stroke thing thrown back to us soon lol

[–] ridethisbike@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Us: pumping heat into the atmosphere.

Mother earth: oh you guys cold? Don't worry, I got you fam!

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't sound as cheap as running the heater for a few hours.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago

Think of the power/gas savings!

[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Carbon monoxide would be cheaper. We used it for euthanizing animals that couldn't be saved at the wildlife rehab center I worked at. Though, it was done with sealed induction box, not a drafty barn like someone mentioned

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Sounds like it would be more expensive? Nitrogen is incredibly cheap to concentrate out of the air, 70% of what we breath is nitrogen after all.

[–] evranch@lemmy.ca 7 points 10 months ago

Monoxide is incredibly cheap to produce with a crappy farm truck or old tractor. You doing need to distill or concentrate anything, just a hose and the exhaust pipe and a couple hours of fuel for idling.

We used it to gas a nest of rats that had settled in under a grain bin floor. Only a couple rats popped out and they were dazed, the dogs quickly snacked them up. The rest expired rapidly.

A chicken barn is big and drafty but you could just use multiple tractors or detune them on purpose. Any engine running rich produces a lot of CO.

[–] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Nitrogen is expensive and these buildings aren't airtight

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

These are engineering problems. The point is it’s way more humane than dying in a sweat lodge.

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 6 points 10 months ago

Eh, the atmosphere is 70% nitrogen, making liquid nitrogen is basically just a suped up AC.

There are also various methods of simply filtering the nitrogen out of the air. Having on site machines doesn't seem too bad.

[–] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

wouldnt that be more expensive than just cutting off the ventilation? on top of paying for disposal afterwards & whatnot?

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Disposal of what? The air we breathe is 75% nitrogen. The chickens are already going to have be disposed of.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world -1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Or... and this is crazy... not kill them?

[–] Pipoca@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This is specifically talking about mitigation for highly pathogenic avian influenza. HPAI kills chickens fairly quickly, so to contain the spread and minimize the risk of zoonotic spread to people, they kill every bird on every property that it's detected on.

This is one of those situations where no one thinks it's a great solution, it's just a pragmatic one that minimizes the risk towards workers while quickly depopulating the barn. The problem is that this is one of the cheapest and least humane ways to depopulate a barn, and shouldn't be allowed. We should insist that barns allow humane depopulation, or at least less inhumane methods.

[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Or, and I know this sounds even craizer.. not farm them and stop this from happening to begin with?

[–] Spacemanspliff@midwest.social 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] MTK@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Crazy how you can't think past this. Maybe not factory farm them? Shocker, I know.

[–] Veneroso@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago (2 children)

So you want to pay $50 for a McDonald's chicken sandwich? I don't think it's right. These chickens are bred to be oversized and grow fast. They get so big that they can barely move. Full of antibiotics so they don't get infected from sitting in their own leavings.

I am really hoping for lab grown meat personally.

And since you may have missed it, these chickens are all female. There are technically ways to determine sex before they hatch but if you really want to get upset Google 'Chick Grinder'. It's as horrible as it sounds so maybe don't Google it.

That being said, I don't want to pay for $50 chickens as much as I don't want to pay for $2,000 iPhones because that's what having them made without slave/child labor would probably cost....

Ugh

[–] daltotron@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

I think it's kind of a false dichotomy, between spending a lower amount of money (i.e. being poor), and being ethical. I think there's a lot more we could take issue with, on how society is structured, than accept this false dichotomy. There's a better universe out there where instead of having to use paper straws, we all just switch to biodegradable, and it is incentivized that people use metal straws. Same shit with this. There's a universe out there where we eat less meat, where this meat is more sustainably sourced and is locally sourced, which cuts down on logistics, and where, as a result, we don't have to pay 50 bucks for a frankly pretty gross chicken sandwich.

[–] PolarisFx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 months ago

I was reading that Europeans actually found a way to sex the egg so they don't hatch the male eggs, thus negating the need to destroy male chicks. I'm guessing the technology costs money so it's unlikely that US factory farms would use it. Probably easier to kill the with the grinder.