this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
216 points (97.4% liked)

Videos

18274 readers
369 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only (aside from meta posts flagged with [META])
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed
  9. AI generated content must be tagged with "[AI] …" ^Discussion^

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

It’s not just that we don’t enforce any of this crap but we actually encourage it.

Near me there’s one highway where they open the shoulder as a lane during rush hour, intentionally and legally, as the cheap way to widen the road. No one seems to care that it makes accidents bigger, blocks emergency vehicles and people get used to it and do it everywhere

[–] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

So, that technique is actually an attempt to avoid a major problem in road development: you make a road, and now it's easier to travel so people use it and it's congested. So you make it bigger and traffic flows again, and so more people start using it and it gets congested. This keeps going until you have the freeways in Texas: 26 lanes of bad traffic.

Instead, one notion is to make the road wider only when it needs to be. It usually keeps traffic more mitigated for a few years before habits adjust.

The real fix is to start removing lanes from the highways. People will find other ways to get there and schedule travel as needed. Or they'll move out of the suburbs so they can get to work, or, the most ridiculous notion, they'll vote for the creation of the most basic of light rail systems.

Realistically they'll bulldoze another 50 mile stretch of urban housing so people can drive easier for the 4 busy hours a day for the next few years, until we eventually entirely demolish the cities to make way for the roads that bring people into them.