this post was submitted on 16 May 2026
201 points (98.1% liked)

politics

29767 readers
2190 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] foggy@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (5 children)

It is at this moment I would like to remind everyone that 100 is the average IQ, which necessarily means that half of the people that walk among us are rocking double digit IQs.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

No, 100 is the median IQ, but that doesn’t preclude there being a lot of people with exactly 100 IQ. Thus there would be less than half of the population below 100 (and also less than half above 100).

[–] kescusay@lemmy.world 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

It's not necessarily half. There could be a group that is a fair bit less than half, but are so dumb they throw the averages off.

It's a normal distribution so it's pretty damn close to half

[–] flandish@lemmy.world 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

what does IQ have to do with the price of groceries?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

They don’t understand what numbers mean and base their beliefs on how things make them feel.

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Sure, but the poll itself is already dumb. Why poll opinions on a fact? It implies there's any actual value or some truth to this.

[–] arrow74@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Because very often people vote based on how they feel and that does not always align with the facts

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Something can be a fact and a belief at the same time. E.G. some people believe the moon landing was faked or that the Earth is flat. It's a fact that the cost of living was lower under Biden yet some people believe that it's lower under Trump. Those people are just as crazy as the flat Earthers, and yet they still exist. The real concerning thing is how many of them there are though. The fact that it's not something like 1% or fewer that believes Trump is better is really concerning but sadly not surprising. Your average Trump supporter is really dumb and ignorant.

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, but why even poll for that?

[–] orclev@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Because if 40% of people believed the Earth was flat you'd probably want to know that. It shows what a disturbingly large chunk of the US is just straight delusional and to a certain extent how we got into this situation in the first place. Decades after decades of propaganda and the constant stream of bullshit from places like Fox News and then Facebook has reduced a significant chunk of the US population into idiots that are literally incapable of just observing reality and coming to a reasonable conclusion.

[–] Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Because for some people it can be cheaper, especially if they moved. So, the poll sheds light on for how many people are their lives more or less expensive even if on average we know most prices went up for most products.

[–] ReluctantlyZen@ani.social 1 points 6 hours ago

It does, but that doesn't seem to have been the intend of the poll

Actually the average is like 103 nowadays im assuming from better nutrition than when IQ tests were invented about 100 years ago