this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
203 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

84807 readers
5237 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fira@lemmy.today 50 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Tax the rich you coward!!

Seriously though, is he trying to fire a salvo in some BS culture war battle? Maybe he thinks taxing software will effectively tax ai?

[–] MysticKetchup@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, taxing the average consumer more but refusing to tax billionaires is regressive and dumb as hell. Newsom is a sellout

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

The exemption on silicon valley's sales tax is a defacto subsidy of billionaires.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Why stop there? food stamps are a subsidy for corporate ag. Public roads are a subsidy for big oil. And schools are a subsidy for all the companies that don't educate their workers. Wow, we are very smart of have realized this

[–] fira@lemmy.today 2 points 14 hours ago

Damn sounds like we need some good old fashioned communism so we make sure the subsidies are going to the people rather than some rich egomaniacs hedge fund

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is mostly a tax in video games. Basically it's an attack on steam.

I'm in California. If I but a game(software) I pay tax if I do it at Best buy. If I buy it on steam I pay no sales tax.

I wouldn't be surprised if 99% of all software bought in stores is just video games.

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Steam already charges a state sales tax, so this isn't at Steam. There are a lot of other smaller online stores that don't bother with state taxes though.

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That's only partly correct. Steam only charges a state sales tax for states that require sales tax on its purchases. CA does not impose state sales tax on digital products, so Steam does not charge CA residents a sales tax on purchases. This is aiming to level the playing field for brick and mortar stores as well as make more money (from normal people instead of taxing billionaires).

[–] zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

That's interesting, I've seen it in multiple states and just assumed it was the standard at this point. Is CA late to the game on this because so many of the online companies lobbied against it hard in their home state?

[–] dogslayeggs@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I'm not sure, but that sounds likely. We have Silicon Valley, which contains billionaires who think they are more important than other people and have no problem saying stupid stuff like, "taxing digital products will cost jobs and move companies out of CA."

[–] frog@lemmus.org 15 points 1 day ago

He works for billionaires. This is just a virtue signal to make it look like he could be taxing AI when really it's a regressive tax that would hurt poor people the most and further save his voter base: billionaires.

So he will never push a genuine wealth tax, but he will push red herrings.