Watches

0 readers

1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

communick@style.land

[Question] Your top pick for a not-crazy expensive ($5K or less) grail watch? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by Classic-Macaron6594@alien.top to c/watches@style.land

313 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Obviously $5M is a lot of money, but for a lot of middle class people like myself this is attainable in a lifetime after saving for a while. Curious what each person’s choice would be for a “grail watch” that isn’t ridiculously expensive.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Spuckuk@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If your grail is poor mans rolex, sure

[–] markgtba@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What an utter bullshit comment, Tudor make great watches that are bought by a variety of collectors including Rolex owners because they like them rather than being a cheap version of whatever.

[–] Spuckuk@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

Thats the perception and how they're presented.

[–] WingedCactus@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

$4k watch is for poor man? Ok.

[–] taffyraptor@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd take Tudor over Rolex just about any day of the week. I prefer their designs and I like the fact that I can literally just go and buy one without having to suck off an AD for years beforehand.

[–] Spuckuk@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, same honestly. Rolex does nothing for me and the prices are daft

[–] McGirton@alien.top 1 points 1 year ago

I think newer Rolex watches are rather tacky. Classic ones, nice. However I still prefer the snowflake hand over the typical Rolex hand. Tudor design is just plain better.