this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
390 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

84881 readers
3452 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 44 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

“Permanently” lol it’s a subscription and the terms say they can change the price at any time. How is it legal for them to advertise with the word “permanent”?

[–] BlackLaZoR@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

lol it’s a subscription

It's actually API access price, and it's charged per input + output tokens. $0.87 per million tokens is damn cheap.

They probably have super cheap electricity and it's possible they use cheap Chinese Ai chips for inference.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's meant to convey that it's not a temporary deal on the old price, but a permanent new price point.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

What is the effective difference? It’s not like they’re offering long term contracts.

[–] Crit@lemmy.wtf 1 points 1 hour ago

Likely more to do with communication to customers on sale pages and such, and consequently with customer protection laws. They likely can't advertise it as a discounted price for example in the same way a seasonal sale would be signposted, I would imagine at least.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

60% of the time it works every time

[–] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t use any of them much and from my limited experience they all seem to be pretty much the same. In fact DeepSeek probably has been a little better than ChatGPT.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

As long as you don't mind them harvesting every tiny bit of data you feed it.

I don't like the big US players, but at least they're doing a tiny bit to keep out of your shit. Deepseek is not pretending at all. I suppose it's at least honest and the price point is REALLY tempting. Openclaw gets expensive fast with the number of tokens it consumes. I burned through $30 in two days with it using Claude Haiku/Sonnet. Plugging it into cheap LLM is a nice idea, but no thanks.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 1 points 37 minutes ago

I don't like the big US players, but at least they're doing a tiny bit to keep out of your shit.

Oh, bless your heart, you sweet summer child.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 15 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Permanent under the current pricing model, subject to change.