this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
360 points (96.9% liked)

politics

29872 readers
2072 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

archive article https://archive.is/hXQTC

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

If you don't know the most basic 8th-grade level facts about US government, maybe don't opine on US politics.

[–] Redvenom@retrolemmy.com 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

India and Mexico already had female presidents and both of those countries have very intrinsic machismo, but the US is not there yet. I don't have any faith in the US, most likely scenario is that Trump runs a 3rd term because laws, logic and consequences don't apply to him

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago

What you missed is that AOC has a much better chance than Mamdani. Why? Because Mamdani's chances are essentially zero. Mamdani immigrated to the US. Only natural-born citizens can be president. Mamdani becoming president would require the removal of this constitutional provision. That would require an act to pass by 2/3rds vote in both chambers of Congress and then for that amendment to be ratified by 3/4 of all the individual state legislatures. While this is theoretically possible, it's essentially impossible. Immigration is already unpopular in the US. And there's no way you're getting 3/4s of the states, including many deep red Republican states, to amend the constitution so Mamdani can be president.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz -3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Although they are clearly incorrect about NYC mayors having a good chance at running for president, you are wrong about the us. You suck, you are bringing the world down, and you better get used to people having opinions about the us (most will be negative) and voicing them to you. Its going to happen more and more as time goes on, and just like when us has had opinions on almost every other place on earth for the last 80 ish years they are going to shove it in your face whenever possible.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 9 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Only natural-born citizens can become U.S. president and Mamdani isn't one.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Our president isn't supposed to be a rapist war criminal, either. The rules are dead.

[–] brown567@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I'm almost positive Washington did some war crimes, and Jefferson was a rapist, so that doesn't hold up super well

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 15 hours ago

Yeap, that is correct. My point of people having stupid opinions that they are going to share remains however.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

Thank you! That's what I was getting at.