this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
472 points (94.7% liked)

News

36491 readers
2836 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Last year, I wrote a great deal about the rise of “ventilation shutdown plus” (VSD+), a method being used to mass kill poultry birds on factory farms by sealing off the airflow inside barns and pumping in extreme heat using industrial-scale heaters, so that the animals die of heatstroke over the course of hours. It is one of the worst forms of cruelty being inflicted on animals in the US food system — the equivalent of roasting animals to death — and it’s been used to kill tens of millions of poultry birds during the current avian flu outbreak.

As of this summer, the most recent period for which data is available, more than 49 million birds, or over 80 percent of the depopulated total, were killed in culls that used VSD+ either alone or in combination with other methods, according to an analysis of USDA data by Gwendolen Reyes-Illg, a veterinary adviser to the Animal Welfare Institute (AWI), an animal advocacy nonprofit. These mass killings, or “depopulations,” in the industry’s jargon, are paid for with public dollars through a USDA program that compensates livestock farmers for their losses.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dangblingus@lemmy.dbzer0.com -4 points 2 years ago (5 children)

So you'll put your money where your mouth is and stop buying chicken then right? That's how condemnation works.

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

No it’s not, you’re confusing condemnation with boycott

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I raise my own chickens. I love them very much. Some of them get eaten. I am very grateful to those. You don’t have to be a vegan to be a good person.

[–] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

In their eyes you do.

Also a backyard chicken owner. My ladies live well

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago

You don't necessarily have to be vegan to be a good person. I'm sure your chickens wouldn't miss an egg or two every once in a while. It is pretty fucked up to claim that you love them, but also kill and eat them sometimes. Like, I love my cat, and because of that the idea of putting her dead body in my mouth makes me feel sick.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

"I love my chickens so much that I kill and eat them sometimes"

Remind me not to let you watch my dogs

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Wow. I’m really fucking floored by y’all’s response. Where do you think your food comes from man? Seriously. I’m not being ugly, like you are, im trying to understand how you feel like you have less impact than I do. I am just able to take the responsibility for my own food

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My food comes primarily from farms. I'm not saying I necessarily have less of an impact on anything than you, all I'm saying is that I don't kill animals for food and I don't pay for them to be killed.

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You mocked me, man. It only hurts in the super small space that internet strangers can reach but it exists, regardless of how small. So. Bullshit.

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I pointed out some cognitive dissonance. I care a little bit more about random animals' lives than I do about random internet strangers' feelings.

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And while we are talking about cognitive dissonance, where the fuck do you think YOUR food comes from?

[–] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I already said farms. Who's the dumb fuck here?

Go kill some more chickens and then claim to love them. Or maybe stop pretending you care about animals

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Are you trolling me? Lol. I feel like im in the other end of some joke

[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

I was being sarcastic you dumb fuck.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] MycoBro@lemmy.world -4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Yes. I do. I have a separate small flock. I feed my family a proportion of our food over half that I grow, rise, and make myself. It would be impossible with out the protein from the chickens. And before anyone says some dumb shit to me, you do the math of your monoculture grown vegan food and if you still think my overall footprint is greater than yours, you are wrong.

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

And yet, you couldn't resist the temptation to be aggressive and further turn off people to the idea of going meat free, vs trying to kindly convince them.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I get my chicken (and beef) from small, local neighboring farms, directly. I don't see the problem?

[–] triangle5106@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If your question is genuine, these small farms you speak of are still breeding animals with intent to slaughter them. At the end of the day, the only meaningful difference with a small farm is that you can probably shake the hand of the person who needlessly killed an animal. Can't get that at those big mean factory farms, that's for sure.

[–] Garbanzo@lemmy.world -2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

intent to slaughter them

Assuming that's the intent is an asshole move. What if the primary intent is to extract nutrition from land that is otherwise unproductive?

[–] triangle5106@reddthat.com 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Is it not the intent? A farmer generally isn't going to raise an animal for fun. That wouldn't be profitable, and small farms are already difficult to make a living on.

I can entertain the idea that I could walk up to a farmer and ask them what their intent is, and they reply, "why it's to extract nutrition from land that is otherwise unproductive, of course!". But the end result is the same in either case regardless of stated intent: animals are being killed unnecessarily.

To be clear, none of this applies to people who rely on animal products to survive (e.g. people in the unproductive land you mentioned). I'm talking about people like myself (and likely many others here) who have access to supermarkets and other products of a globalized food system. Like Uncle Ben said, with great ~~power~~ privilege comes great responsibility.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 2 years ago

Land has more value than economic activity, such as natural habitat and biodiversity and recreation (all things farmers destroy lol)

[–] 4lan@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's hilarious, people have no sense of personal responsibility whatsoever. Just look at COVID.

They use the argument that one person not eating meat won't change anything. Ignoring the fact that they are literally deriving joy from suffering. It doesn't have to be this way. I truly believe meat can be ethical, but when 99.8% of beef is factory farmed I do not have the option to ethically eat meat.

17 years meat free and every once in awhile I reconsider adding chicken to my diet. Then I see a post like this lol

[–] triangle5106@reddthat.com 0 points 2 years ago

I think ethical meat can only truly exist in theory (though with cell culture meat I suspect that that will change).

Anyway, I just wanted to say 17 years is a long time. Thanks for walking the talk. Not many people do.