this post was submitted on 28 May 2026
281 points (98.6% liked)

science

27210 readers
699 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

dart board;; science bs

rule #1: be kind

lemmy.world rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
281
we're so smol (lemmy.world)
submitted 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) by zedgeist@lemmy.world to c/science@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thebestaquaman@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago

There's a plethora of possibilities here, and as you say, they could be very "resource steered". On a planet with absolutely massive reserves of easily available iron or aluminium, but basically no calcium oxide, reinforced concrete may never have been invented. Sure, based on the composition of the known universe, that's highly unlikely, but it's far from impossible.

I think we tend to forget how our society and technology is shaped by the materials available to us. A planet with a significantly different composition could quickly end up with drastically different technology. Regarding combustion engines: If their atmosphere has significantly less oxygen than ours, they would be so inefficient that they were abandoned early, while if their atmosphere has very high oxygen content the fuels could be regarded as too unsafe to work with, also leading to early abandonment.

If their crust, air, or water has significant acid content, they may never have gotten far with metal working (because everything just corrodes) and developed highly advanced polymers, ceramics, and glasses instead.

The list goes on and on..