this post was submitted on 29 May 2026
223 points (99.6% liked)

Dull Men's Club

4204 readers
931 users here now

An unofficial chapter of the popular Dull Men's Club.

https://dullmensclub.com/

1. Relevant commentary on your own dull life. Posts should be about your own dull, lived experience. This is our most important rule. Direct questions, random thoughts, comment baiting, advice seeking, many uses of "discuss" rarely comply with this rule.

2. Original, Fresh, Meaningful Content.

3. Avoid repetitive topics.

4. This is not a search engine
Use a search engine, a tradesperson, Reddit, friends, a specialist Facebook group, apps, Wikipedia, an AI chat, a reverse image search etc. to answer simple questions or identify objects. Also see rule 1, “comment baiting”.

There are a number of content specific communities with subject matter experts who can help you.

Some other communities to consider before posting:

5. Keep it dull. If it puts us to sleep, it’s on the right track. Examples of likely not dull: jokes, gross stuff (including toes), politics, religion, royalty, illness or injury, killing things for fun, or promotional content. Feel free to post these elsewhere.

6. No hate speech, sexism, or bullying No sexism, hate speech, degrading or excessively foul language, or other harmful language. No othering or dehumanizing of anyone or negativity towards any gender identity.

7. Proofread before posting. Use good grammar and punctuation. Avoid useless phrases. Some examples: - starting a post with "So" - starting a post with pointless phrases, like "I hope this is allowed" or “this is my first post” Only share good quality, cropped images. Do not share screenshots of images; share the original image.

.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I was too curious and broke the seal. Will actually try to use it, probably for the rare full /home backup every 2 or 3 years, since it needs external power and is probably not that fast. I'd date this artifact late 2000s? It might have USB 2, making it fast enough.

Weird though that I'd buy this and forget about it forever. It definitely cost enough to matter to me back then.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

I don't think I even saw a hdd over 120gb with IDE. Last IDE drive I had was 60gb. This thing is for sure sata

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I remember seeing IDE drives all the way up to 1TB. Anything over 80GB was pretty uncommon though.

I had some 320GB IDE drives in my nForce2 chipset Socket A system, which thanks to the southbridge used on the motherboard, I had USB2.0 but no SATA support.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You could have gotten a sata enclosure and had faster speeds over USB 2.0 lol but if I remember correctly, back then the first released sata enclosures were like $100.

[–] toddestan@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

USB2.0 is considerably slower than an internal IDE drive. USB 2.0 is 480 megabit/s, and the final generation ATA 133 spec is 133 megabyte/s, which is around 1065 megabit/s, so over twice as fast. Ditto for things like latency. While the hard drives of the time physically couldn't saturate a PATA connection, the difference in speed was still easily noticed.

At the time, if you wanted a fast external drive you used Firewire, which I actually did. I had several drives that were Firewire 800 but also included USB2.0 to connect to computers that lacked Firewire. I don't recall if any of my motherboards that have Firewire built in can boot off of it but I kind of doubt it.

Later we had eSata for a brief period of time. I still miss it as it's not as fast as USB3.0 which is the only option even today on many new external drives.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Theoretically yes, but most sata drives were faster than ide drives. So it ends up being a wash really...USB 2.0 being the bottle neck and ide drive speed and it not being able to completely hit ATA133s transfer rate really. I still bet that while on paper the IDE looks faster, it'll be slower in real world.

[–] dai@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

I have some 500gb IDE drives (maybe 320? its been a while) kicking around in some original xboxes in the shed. A few have 2tb sata installed with adaptors.

I too have some vague memories shucking 1tb IDE drives and installing those in customers xbox too but that's from 20+ years ago now 😶‍🌫️

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

Holy crap, I didn't realize they kept making the drives large after sata came out. I jumped on that tech real quick once it showed up. IDE was such a pain in the ass for air flow and well making the PC look clean. I remember some people cutting the ide cable so you could roll them into a sleeve vs having a fat ribbon cable.