this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
518 points (96.4% liked)

Technology

85172 readers
5315 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Which came first, the chicken or the egg? Trick question: You need both.

It’s not realistic to build the infrastructure first, then transition: no one could afford that. It would be a huge waste and a boondoggle.

However I do think it was well planned: even the Chinese government would be surprised at our planning….. if we had actually followed through.

In addition to the decades long transition, there was

  • subsidies for car manufacturers to retool and retrain
  • incentives for EV buyers
  • incentives for home charger installers, from consumer to landlord to business
  • infrastructure money to start building out trip chargers along interstates

So yes, the infrastructure would have grown with the market, more smoothly than the market alone could have. Yes American companies would have solid business advantages in new technologies. Yes, American car companies would still be relevant at that point