this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
783 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85172 readers
4594 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 39 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I didn't know that the SNP500 had such rules, but I'm so happy they didn't cave.

I hope people sue the indexes for changing the rules. Im not sure its possible but it really makes an index meaningless if its not consistent.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 7 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

Nasdaq and Russel caved though. I don't know if there is a way to avoid them in our 401k.

[–] vatlark@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

You should have the ability to select the investments in your 401k.

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

I mean, every company I participated in just give a menu of 20 or 40 mutual funds, targeting different maturation points or Industries, and people absolutely are allowed to pick which funds they want there 401K allocated into. It's just going to require an additional 10 minutes of searching to find out how much AI diaper load is riding in your preferred funds, and possibly having to forgo growth funds and total index funds for some number of seasons.

Personally, I just moved to roughly 40% in Int'l funds despite ASML and TSMC being featured prominently, because it is still a net reduction in exposure and because I need the diversification (~10% a S&P 500' value is directly exposed either AI or semiconductor, and roughly 33% of S&P 500 is straight Tech of some flavor).

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I actually just went hella heavy on Int'l and value stocks, in order to completely divest from Musk exposure in my retirement accounts.

[–] sommerset@thelemmy.club 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

Which muskless and ai-less indexes u found? I'm working on the same

[–] cardfire@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

VTV is value stocks, so minimal exposure. AND Vanguard Healthcare fund has often had consistent performance across Market Cycles. I haven't yet found an anti AI portfolio.

I'm looking ex-us for my growth and blended strategies. VXUS and VEA principally.

[–] Ray661@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

Every 401k I and my wife have had let us set which index, but would rebalance itself every year because they believe they know better. It’s really annoying, but if you’re familiar with the markets, I would say it’s very necessary. Especially since the default funds will often have fees associated to them.