this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2026
452 points (96.3% liked)

Science Memes

20437 readers
972 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

people created the ideas of countries, then made a list of them. USA is on that list.

People? Which people? If I get a bunch of people and declare a micronation within what the US considers it's borders, is that objectively a country or not? Or suppose I convince a bunch of Americans that Germany isn't really a country, does it then cease to be a country despite what the Germans themselves believe?

In any case, I would think that if something falls under the standard of, "This is true because a bunch of people say it is, even though there's nothing physical you can point to to prove it" then it seems somewhat absurd to call that an "objective fact" What do "objective" and "subjective" even mean, then?

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in arguing semantics or philosophy. you can disagree with my example, I don't care.

the point is, there are objective facts and subjective opinions.

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

I see, so you're only interested in asserting your own philosophical positions, not examining or defending them in any way.

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

ohh sorry, is this a philosophy group?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Apparently? You keep making philosophical assertions.

You don't get to assert your philosophical views and then say, "I'm not interested is discussing philosophy" to avoid examination and criticism of those views.

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

do you agree with my assertion that some things are objective facts and some are not?

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes.

Not trying to say that everything is subjective, but that in particular is kind of a bad example.

I just think you're being dismissive, while setting your own ideas as being apart from philosophy.

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i know that any example I could give could be argued against, and I really don't wanna dive into that because it has no end.

like I said, the only thing anyone knows for sure is that they're experiencing something, call it consciousness or whatever. however, that is not a great example of fact vs fiction, and this isn't a philosophy debate sub, so I tried to keep it simple.

there are better examples, but I'm just trying to explain a simple concept, not get into the bottomless argument of philosophical truth

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

But you're explaining it with such a bad example that it undermines the whole point, it's like if you said, "Some things are just objective facts, like which poems are good." That to me indicates that it's not really a simple concept at all, you just don't see the depth because you haven't examined it. Being unwilling to examine it, framing that examination as "the bottomless argument of philosophical truth," only reinforces that. If you're not willing to examine the question, then don't assert that you know the answer in the first place.

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

i don't care.

have a good one

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Don't try to explain things you neither understand nor care about then.

[–] BloodMuffin@lemmy.ca -1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you're not my real dad! you can't tell me what to do!

[–] Objection@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I can only lead a horse to water, I can't make you think.