this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2026
1172 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30047 readers
2447 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

While the intake report memorialized allegations that multiple girls were murdered and buried at a Trump golf course, newly released Epstein records suggest federal investigators ultimately viewed the source skeptically. Other FBI summaries released by the Justice Department indicate complainants making similar allegations were “deemed not credible,” and no publicly released records show that authorities excavated any Trump golf course or uncovered evidence supporting the claims.

Guess the rich only ever saw consequences once: France in 1792

What would America's Storming the Bastille moment even look like? Storming the child-rape mansion that is Mar-a-Lago? Who's head would get carried away on a pike? Miller's? Theil's? Musk's?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] blarth@thelemmy.club 42 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I’m tired of these “breaking news” stories about FBI tip line calls reporting stuff Trump did with Epstein.

##We are being played.##

I feel 100% certain that there is recorded evidence of Trump having sex with underage girls, but that is not what we have here. We are like cats chasing lasers on the floor while the real shit gets covered up.

Don’t fall for this distraction.

[–] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel 100% certain that there is recorded evidence of Trump having sex with underage girls

RAPING. The world you were looking for is RAPING. Trump RAPING underage girls.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (2 children)

There is no such thing as an underage girl. The correct word is child. Is there a such thing as an underaged boy? Never heard that. Stop using the pedophile language please. Child they are children

[–] yakko@feddit.uk 31 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We're all on one side against the pedophilic oligarchs, can we stop having this shitty little outrage contest at each other? This anger at one another is misdirected.

[–] RampantParanoia2365@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

....what? Boy and Girl mean underage. There's no such thing as an underage woman.

[–] tgcoldrockn@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

In most popular culture music lyrics, those terms are being used for sexual situations all of the time. It is how people talk.

Colloquially, sure. Boy and Girl still mean Child. Not sure how any English speaker could possibly not know this.

[–] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

It is how people talk informally, but I would assume any mention of a girl or boy on the news referred to a child.

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 10 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, Epstein died 7 years ago, during Trumps first term as president, and since neither Trump's nor Biden's administrations released the files entirely so far, there is a huge risk that the most damming evidence has been lost or tampered with.

At this point, I hope that there are a few agents who has managed to save unaltered copies of the files in a hidden locked box, just waiting for a good opportunity (for themselves) to release them.

[–] greenbit@lemmy.zip 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 days ago

Humm, that would be an interesting development....

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Also this is just an fbi tip. They are legally required to document the claims; that doesn't mean they are any more than claims. We should not be focusing on unsubstantiated shit when there is definitely more concrete evidence out there.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 days ago

Yeah calling bullshit on this dribbling of alleged information.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 5 points 3 days ago

Yeah, most of the Epstein files have not been released. That is an objective fact. And obviously it is the worst (for Trump) which they have held back, even though the stuff they have released is already pretty bad for him.

They are not going to release anymore though.