this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
735 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85342 readers
5516 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yes, if they supplied batteries to independent testers, that would quickly prove their technically claims are true or false.

But the hole they've dug isn't just about technical claims. As I said, they've relied on dodgy marketing tactics which has caused industry damage, and that wouldn't just disappear. They'd still have huge business reputation issues regarding things like trust for starters. Businesses are far more than just their technology. Plenty of great tech has failed due to other factors and execution.

[–] Iunnrais@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hold that If their claims were true, any sketchy marketing would be forgiven very, very quickly.

[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Battery chemistry patents are notoriously easy to "design around" to create variations. Who is going to want to risk working with a company that has a track record of being notoriously dodgy, especially when there's a couple of dozen well established major players that have solid reputations and scale.