this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
735 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

85315 readers
4262 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

Ah....the Theranos business plan.

[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Can for once something too good to be true actually be true? :(

[–] Naz@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago

Well, the original Li-Ion batteries by John Goodenough are Goodenough

We just need a Dr. John BetterBatteryMan for solid battery tech

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 57 points 2 days ago (3 children)

3D printed quantum solid state AI fusion reactors on asteroids is the future!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What no nanobots? What sort of product is this.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

That's like '90s hype based in '80s dreams, like Drexler's Engines Of Creation. I could have also thrown in chaos theory and fuzzy logic but these buzzwords are quite obscure now.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Fueled by FSD SpaceX xAI. /$

I bet someone from HN is already "generating" that brilliant idea thanks to their SOTA meta-harness right now using Claude Fable. Or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 85 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Really, how is that possible? The company making absolutely ridiculous claims that are in no way possible and are instantly a red flag for anyone whos ever touched tech with a 20 foot pole instantly sees is lying about there mystical miracle tech?

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Critical thinking is a dying concept. Most of humanity has no concept of reality any more. There area few points of hope in the younger generation but it's not looking promising from where I'm sitting.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

all hope died the second AI become available and people started using that to create their own, personal, comfortable micro-realities, free of pesky facts and truth.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 41 points 2 days ago (6 children)

The problem is there are multiple tech companies involved, all bullshitting each other. It starts with a German screening technology company claiming they can screen produce the solid state electrode, when they never made a single battery ever. if company A can develop the tech then company B can assemble the battery to do into the motorcycles in company C.

Formula E racing uses the state of the art in batteries, and for 2027 they sourced a lithium battery even though cost was no object.

Two Chinese companies claim to be making solid state batteries, put the performance is only equal to classic lithium.

Toyota got burned on this. They were promised SS batteries delivered by 2025. Never happened.

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Donut Labs was also looking for funding from a large number of smaller investors, none of which had the knowledge or capability to really look into what was going on

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

This is a model now.

Never invest in tech if you cannot do due diligence.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 184 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Wild. Did they really think they could just hype this up and release something like this and not get found out?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 86 points 2 days ago

That's how its done now thanks to assholes like this.

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's worked for their channel so far.

[–] cannedtuna@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Except they’ve misled investors, and that will get them into deep shit.

Because fuck consumers

Mislead consumers, FTC sleeps

Mislead investors…

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 30 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What FTC lmao, they're a Finnish company registered in Estonia. Billionaires don't get fast tracked court cases here. They'll move to some other country long before anything happens.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] suigenerix@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reading the article, the investigation isn't a case of independent labs getting hold of the battery and definitively disproving Donut's claims. It's battery experts and researchers looking at the data Donut has released and saying, "these claims are extraordinary and the evidence doesn't yet convince us. Here's what we think the battery actually is." That's a very reasonable scientific position, especially when you're talking about 400 Wh/kg, 5-minute charging, and 100,000 cycles all at once.

But without independently tested samples, there are still a lot of unknowns and inferences involved. That's not to say the skeptics are wrong, but it's still arguably a case of skeptics being skeptical... reasonably so, but based on analysis of the available evidence rather than direct examination of the battery itself.

[–] ryven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 days ago (6 children)

This seems to be a smoking gun:

Researchers say the most convincing evidence came from measuring how the cell expanded during charging.

When a battery charges, ions move into the anode, causing it to expand. Graphite anodes have a unique expansion pattern because of changes in graphite’s layered structure. The Donut Lab cell showed this exact pattern.

This finding matters because sodium ions are too big to fit into graphite the way lithium ions do. According to investigators, the graphite expansion pattern clearly shows that lithium is the active ion in the battery.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 129 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Industry experts who met with CT Coatings representatives doubted their technical skills. Julian Zanau from the Fraunhofer Research Institute recalled concerns following discussions with company officials.

“The first impression I got was that these people have no idea how a battery actually works. They were talking about no rare earth metals in their batteries and therefore no lithium, and to any chemist lithium has nothing to do with rare earth minerals.”

🔥

[–] chaogomu@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago (7 children)

The running theory I had seen was that they were licensing out someone else's tech, and then claiming it as their own.

And now this article shows that to be more true than I had thought.

Meanwhile, there's a company out of Taiwan doing this, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQFVIs4leig

The guy cuts a cell in half with a pair of scissors, and as soon as the scissors are pulled away the little LED light comes back on.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kn33@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm not surprised, but I am disappointed

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] W98BSoD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

“There’s a problem loading the page.”

Yeah, your overly intrusive advertising.

http://archive.is/UsPCy

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 32 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Dang, was just seeing a bunch of YT vids popping up about this, how it was going to be big if true.

If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 55 points 2 days ago

They didn't need to keep it secret forever, just long enough to grab more money.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

If they are really a fraud, how did they think they wouldn’t get caught??

That's how Ponzi schemes work. See this thing?

Under $50,000! All carbon fiber! Solar powered! 1,600 km range!

This thing has been vaporware since 2009, company started 20 YEARS AGO -4,000 suckers signed up.

It went chapter 11 in 2011.

Bought by a Chinese company, " company stated it would manufacture 5000 vehicles by the end of 2012".

total to date: 0.

On December 8, 2020, the company presented a driveable prototype and started accepting reservations. By December 14 the company had over 3000 refundable preorders for $100 each. Aptera released its 2021 annual report in May 2022, stating they had 103 employees and over 18,000 reservations for their solar electric vehicle. By mid 2022, the company raised a total of $40 million, planning to get to production by the end of the year.They acquired three buildings in Carlsbad, California, with a combined space of over 100,000 sq ft (9,300 m2). In November 2022 Aptera announced they have redesigned the structural components of the vehicle, and it requires more funding before they can get to production.

total to date: 0.

Aptera announced in April 2025 the company raised a total of $130 million through crowdfunding and $10 million from other investors, and the company requires an additional $60 million before it can start low-volume production.

total to date: 0.

Aptera announced in March 2026 it has raised a further $17M, and plans starting low-scale production no earlier than March 2027 pending raising a further $50 million.

It just goes on and on and no one is questioning the utter bullshit claims of range and solar charging and the lack of a single vehicle in 20 years.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aptera_Motors

But when Elizabeth Holmes did this...straight to jail.

Now in 2026, there are serious safety concerns about vehicles that look like cars but are actually motorcycles. There is a Federal bill to ban these on the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AaronR@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] SnoringEarthworm@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kn1ghtDigital@lemmy.zip 20 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Does this mean the technology is impossible at current then? Or just that the company didn't deliver?

[–] Some_Emo_Chick@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

There are several companies making great leaps right now. It is still far from commercially viable yet.

Which is why it seemed so far fetched for Donut to claim they had this battery without anyone knowing they were working on it. It was immediately suspicious.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ulkesh@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I'm shocked, I tell you. SHOCKED!

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] londos@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Who knew donuts had holes?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›