this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
235 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

20459 readers
1387 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnarchoEngineer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Well the diversity of the Cambrian explosion makes more sense now. Life on earth discovered sex and just had a few million year long planet-wide orgy lol

On a serious note, what if that’s actually kind of what happened? Like what if species specific sexual reproduction wasn’t the norm when life was starting out? If animals were basically just accepting whatever DNA was given them—regardless of whether it was from their species or not—sure lots of the offspring wouldn’t be viable, but ample food and lacking predators means you can try again. This kind of breeding would facilitate some incredible genetic diversity which is exactly what we see in the Cambrian diversification.

We have no idea why so many of them looked the way they do, but what if thats because they inherited lots of traits they didn’t need?

[–] GentriFriedRice@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that's a little backwards. Evolution is all about filling niches. The article seems to state Ediacaran diversity was driven by phenotypic (environment-induced) variation caused by ecological stressors. They claim sexual reproduction seems to be a product of environmental factors which drove the diversification.

It's thought that the Ediacaran had fewer viable niches than the Cambrian, it's just really not understood why that is. We don't really see anything near that explosion in diversity again until the land-colonization of the Devonian which is kind of the same explosion driven by unoccupied niche phenomena

[–] Tlaloc_Temporal@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago

Was that Worms and the churning up of the sea floor, or was that earlier than the Ediacaran?