this post was submitted on 18 Nov 2023
127 points (87.1% liked)

Technology

59377 readers
6041 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The rocket boosters on the space shuttle were absolutely reused. Here's video of one being retrieved.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

We can argue about semantics, but they were moreso rebuilt from the same parts than reused as is. NASA found that it would have been much cheaper to build new SRBs after each launch than rebuild them.

[–] Strykker@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

SRB boosters are quite close to literally just a big steel tube, and they reused them by dropping them into the ocean under a parachute.

They still had to clean out and refurb every booster launched. And that was without the complex rocket engines that would get destroyed by being submerged in the ocean.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 1 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Here's

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.