this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
318 points (98.8% liked)

politics

30069 readers
2740 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 65 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Even hearing recorded conversations wouldn’t result in the usa media doing or saying anything.

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 8 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. If it did then the "grab them by the pussy" tape would have been the end of it. Instead it was just the beginning.

[–] tmyakal@infosec.pub 2 points 39 minutes ago

I've heard Chris Christie tell an anecdote about the 2016 campaign a few times:

To hear him tell it, Christie was watching the live interview where Trump said McCain wasn't a war hero because heroes don't get captured. When Christie heard that line, he picked up the phone and called Jeb Bush, and said, "Looks like it's down to just you and me. Do you want to be my VP?"

Because any other candidate at any point in modern history dismissing a veteran like that would've been immediately unelectable.

[–] exaybachae@startrek.website 14 points 12 hours ago

Isn't a published book 'media saying something'?

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Even hearing recorded conversations wouldn’t result in the usa media doing or saying anything.

I think we're on the same post, yeah?

[–] gdog05@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago

Yes but no. What happens is, an actual journalist does their job and people get up in arms. Commercial media will slowly start to cover the topic. In this case, the audio will come out and the world is aghast. Commercial media will interview Trump or his cabinet and ask "how do you respond to the rumors of this audio?" As if the audio isn't real and as if we've not all heard it. Like it's an anomalous thing that he's accused of like a case of he said-she said between rival politicians. Like it's not obviously real and factual. That's how it gets covered.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago

i was thinking broadcast media. I suppose a book is media, but does it reach a broad audience?