this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
110 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

85477 readers
5458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Corvidae@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Seems kinda like a pecking order. Target the young ones. And by prohibiting kids, you can ID everyone.

[–] lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

That's the thing. I'm not only perfectly fine with getting anyone under the age of 16 off the Internet, I'd also like to see everyone under the age of 21 off the Internet. But it has to be done in a way that utilizes the strength of modern technology and protects our privacy. It's extremely doable to achieve this, and governments know this, but getting kids off the Internet is not what the government is trying to do.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Segregate the 16-21 to their own internet area so they arent radicalized by the old boomer ideas and they can form their own opinion.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

The government can probably id kids anyway through their parents