this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2026
695 points (97.8% liked)

linuxmemes

31793 readers
1889 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn, no politics, no trolling or ragebaiting.
  • Don't come looking for advice, this is not the right community.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 3 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    So what are good antivirus options for Linux? is it still pretty much just ClamAV?

    [–] Johanno@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

    Our company uses eset https://www.eset.com/us/home/antivirus/

    But afaik it costs money to really work.

    But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

    [–] pressanykeynow@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

    But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

    Is there an AUR package for it? seems not in the official repo

    [–] placebo@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

    But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

    It's useful to use brain, but any security layer has holes which is why it's good to have several layers. Some attacks might be way beyond user's understanding or come from trusted sources.

    But your brain should be the best antivirus you have.

    True of virtually every OS.

    But "only stupid people get viruses" is exactly the kind of trap that catches folks.

    [–] AceSLive@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

    I have eset home but now I've gone completely linux, and they don't do it for home - only business

    Which sucks, as I have a year left on my subscription I can no longer use :/

    [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

    one thread I found from 2 years ago where someone asked for the same thing, a lot of the replies are just "you don't need antivirus on Linux" lmao

    [–] plutopos@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

    There is no malware on Linux and there is no war in Ba Sing Se

    [–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    a lot of the replies are just "you don't need antivirus on Linux"

    Which is completely true when using distros like Debian, Fedora, RHEL, OpenSuse, etc.

    Arch (and its derivatives) are designed to be on the bleeding edge with ALL the paper cuts that come with it. It is absolutely not focused on stability or security. If you want those things then stick to Debian or Fedora Silverblue.

    And the second you introduce npm to your system you can throw any semblance of security out the window, regardless of what your operating system is, and no antivirus is going to save you.

    That being said, the fundamental security models between Linux and Windows are very different. And on Linux the overall impact will likely be far less damaging (technologically, not financially) than on Windows. Windows "security" is just a corporate marketing campaign.

    [–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    If you use snap, or flatpaks, or npm, or anything like that you run the same risks.

    [–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

    npm, yes. Snap and flatpak? No. I'm not saying it's impossible to get malware. The difference is that snapd and flatpak have various levels of process isolation that largely mitigates any potential issues.

    The argument isn't "Linux doesn't have malware", the argument is "you don't need to run antivirus on Linux". Those are two very different things.

    Not even the best antivirus will protect you completely, at that point you need good computer hygiene.

    [–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

    Eh. Flatpak has the option for process isolation, but it kinda works similarly to how android apps have default permissions set and the packager can just go "nah, this gets FULL permissions" and unless you go look and change it yourself, the program isn't restricted at all. I don't use ubuntu/snapd so can't speak to that.

    There are more protections on flathub than the AUR for sure - the AUR is closer to just downloading random shit off the internet than a true repository. That said, it's crazy to assign the vulnerabilities of the AUR to Arch as a whole... The Arch repos proper (and even Chaotic AUR) didn't have problems during any of this.

    [–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

    Flatpak has the option for process isolation, but it kinda works similarly to how android apps have default permissions set and the packager can just go "nah, this gets FULL permissions" and unless you go look and change it yourself, the program isn't restricted at all.

    You're not wrong, but even with the AUR it's (last I checked/heard) a problem with orphaned packages being picked up by random users, and then a "new" PKGBUILD with the malicious bits getting uploaded.

    The reality is that even if everyone just blindly updated through yay this whole time, very few people would be affected because the number of orphaned packages installed is very low. The package managers tend to bug you about orphaned packages.

    The difference with Flatpaks and the Snap Store is that you can't just take ownership over an abandoned project. You'd have to create your own. And since Canonical is in charge of the Snap Store, they're quick to react to any sort of security issue.

    the AUR is closer to just downloading random shit off the internet than a true repository

    Ultimately that is what it is. Because some packages are grabbing files from just about anywhere.

    The Arch repos proper (and even Chaotic AUR) didn't have problems during any of this.

    And that's really the key. The AUR is bleeding edge with "here be dragons" philosophy. Like I said in my previous comment, if you can't accept those dangerous (work computer, sensitive data, etc) then simply don't use Arch.