this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2026
261 points (98.2% liked)
Technology
85758 readers
3819 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I’d be interested in them for like hud reasons but I wouldn’t want a camera or mic in them which is what they seem to think people want.
It requires a camera to do any remotely useful HUD stuff. If you want automatic translation, or in-world displays, it needs to see the world.
Smartwatches don’t have cameras for the most part, smartglasses don’t need them either. Also a camera isn’t required for audio translation.
I meant text translation obviously. You don't need glasses for audio.
And yeah, smartwatches don't have cameras. They aren't doing anything that needs them. AR, by definition, requires it to know about its environment. It needs a camera at minimum. You could have just smart glasses that can display texts or something, but AR needs cameras.
Smartglasses don't need to be AR though, you could make one that is just a HUD that displays information
What kind of information would my HUD show me, though? Like, idk, my heart rate? I don't want my life to look like some first person shooter.
Where I would get something out of it, would be e.g. when I am repairing stuff to show me where's what (even while thinking about it, I am not sure 😅). Or when I am looking at something in a store to automatically pull up reviews or comparisons. Or showing a manual and highlighting the right screws when building furniture or such.
Welp, not gonna shell out more than low digit hundred Euros for something like that, but all use cases which seem remotely cool...require a camera.
Sure. I don't want that though. Whatever benefit smart glasses could provide can also be provided by just a phone. If you want slightly faster access, a smart watch works too, with slightly less ability for input. Smart glasses, with no camera, can only display this same information, but it's right in your face. Also, without cameras, the only input it could have is on the side of your head, which seems horrible.
AR has some utility I would like. Am I a fan of them putting cameras everywhere? No, so I probably wouldn't buy a pair of AR glasses (and would discourage it of others too). Do I see the functionality? Sure, which I don't see for smart glasses.
Yeah I don’t want any of that though
In my fantasyland you would pair them with another device, like a phone, and it would do all the work. The glasses would basically be nothing more than a receiver and a display
Yes, well that's a fantasy when it comes to AR. It's augmented reality, it needs to see the reality to augment it, else it's just a static screen in front of your face. It isn't anything new or interesting if you don't have the camera in the front.
Just a wireless HUD, with eye tracking, and agnostic to connected tech. (Camera is needed for this, but needs a manual kill switch on the device)
That is all that is needed from the glasses.
Wearable tech is going to need to be modular, replaceable, and reparable...
All things big tech companies hate right now.
An inward facing eye camera is not an issue.
A hud would be cool I suppose. You never know when you need to check someone's power level.