this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
145 points (90.5% liked)

Technology

59472 readers
3484 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] echo64@lemmy.world -3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The boards job is to deliver shareholder value. Ergo, it may or may not be something illegal, all ypu can guarantee is that they think that revealing information might lose shareholder value.

[–] eggymachus@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

The board that fired him was that of the nonprofit, so they don't answer to shareholders.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

They don't have shareholders. Open AI is a nonprofit. So the job of the board is literally to do what is best for the organization, I can't see how it could possibly be good for the organisation to fire the CEO and then point right refused to elaborators to the reason.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

To be honest the shareholder value on a non-profit is, uh, lackluster.