this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
64 points (84.0% liked)

Technology

85661 readers
4124 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 53 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Well thanks for the mystery. Terms with what? Isreali funding? Massive gamehouses fucking over employees? Global financial instability? Bizzare "to ai" or "not to ai"

Question is loving rent free in my fucking broke ass brain

[–] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 44 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

At first I assumed you hadn't read the article and I almost mocked you for it. Then I decided to read the article first, and learned that the information is not in the article.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 27 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

You were going to mock someone for not reading the article without having read the article?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 19 points 12 hours ago

Yes, which is why they didn't do that.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Why are people always so shocked at honesty on the internet?

That person doesn't know us and shouldn't care what we think. So they can be honest they almost did something stupid.

Asking if they really admitted to almost doing something stupid is a million times dumber. Did you really need to ask to be sure, or did you just get giddy because you felt smarter?

You're likely not smarter, just too stubborn to admit under any conditions you almost made a poor choice so now you want to pile on the person who admitted it...

Which is why I'm bothering to make this comment:

You're perpetuating a giant social issue. Owning up to real or even almost poor decisions is something that everyone should feel comfortable admitting. There is nothing wrong with that and sharing it allows the group to learn from the experience.

And if society at large is "the group" we sure as shit need to start trying something besides blond confidence and a refusal to admit we're not perfect.

[–] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip -3 points 8 hours ago

Can I be honest, I didn't read your comment. Way too long, no pictures. You made a good point in the first sentence though.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Seems a bit hypocritical indeed.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well, this is the internet after all…

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I never really understood why people feel the need to act like that towards one another online. Mocking each other, being sarcastic, name-calling and whatnot.

I say, let's act towards each other like we would act towards another person on the bus, at work. People we don't normally talk to or know well, but who we come across. I think most of us wouldn't talk like that towards strangers IRL. Or at least I should hope not.

If we can be kind when anonymous IRL, we can be kind online I'm the same way. I'd say that's worth striving for.

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed 100%

I was just making a bit of a joke… 👍

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah sure, I wasn't having a go at you or anything, just to be clear. 😁 It just came to my mind via your comment is all.

Take care!

[–] marlowe221@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago
[–] artyom@piefed.social 1 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

They were going to but did not. I'll defend the people who don't though: most articles are shit and filled with tons of rambling contextual nonsense just to arbitrarily extend their length. They're also often not the original source of the content, and trying to find the original is a pain in the dick because 90% of the links just link back to their own site, if there even is a link to the original at all. That's why I often add synopses to posts but I wish the people who posted them would add them instead...

[–] corbindallas@fedinsfw.app 9 points 13 hours ago

It's fair. Most don't read.

[–] pnwpixel@programming.dev 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That's just it, he posted this dribble on his LinkedIn; it's where "professionals" can vaguepost about dissatisfaction and anger without sounding mad as hell.

He needs another job, so he can't go apeshit. Wish he would though... that'd be fun to read lol

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

~~Vaguebooking~~ Vaguelinking.