this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2026
1037 points (96.7% liked)

People Twitter

10118 readers
1706 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician. Archive.is the best way.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pageflight@piefed.social 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"The lesson under the lesson:" is a very LLM closing statement.

[–] Saapas@piefed.zip 60 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean the AIs copied it from somewhere

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 78 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Seriously. AI talks like this because this is how effective communicators talk. The fact that people are getting turned off by this way of communicating and seeking out worse writing is concerning, and yet another way that AI is contributing to the dumbing down of society.

[–] caseyweederman@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm keeping my fucking god-damned em dash

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Just use a regular dash. It'll be fine.

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's genuinely making me want to make mistakes just to seem human

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

YouTube videos... It's getting harder. If they don't make mistakes, I can't tell anymore.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't think it's great writing. To me, regardless of AI involvement, it sounds like it's trying hard to be punchy. Big ideas, big impact! But the lack of structural variation and generic vocabulary make it bland, and bland writing doesn't tickle one's imagination or stick in one's memory.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

It's not necessarily great writing, but this style is an effective communication mode. There's a reason that AI uses it, and it's because it works. 🤷‍♂️

[–] Malyca@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Bland can have an impact. The man turned to hookers and blow instead of dusty libraries, cut him a break.

[–] blazeknave@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My CTO and I had a fun convo at 7am about em dashes before a big client preso. We all know we all do it. Why do we care at this point? It's just being transparent.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don't use AI at all, but I refuse to change my writing style just to avoid the appearance of AI use. After all, AI just copies human writers, and if it becomes the norm to write in a style that is distinct from typical AI output, then AI output will just change to the new style and we'll be back at square one.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yall bitch about Ai slop and you can’t even see it when it’s served in front of you by an ex drug addict. Lol and I don’t mind Hunter, but he doesn’t speak like this, the cadence is clearly AI, and the writing fucking sucks it just sounds profound to minds as deep as a puddle. Not to mention, who gives a fuck what he has to say?

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

I hate AI slop as much as the next person, but some people become so obsessed with finding and pointing out that something is AI that everything starts to look like AI. They also tend to use it to dismiss the messaging, as you are doing. In this case, we'll never know if this is AI or not, and it really doesn't matter, because Hunter is correct, and he's using his platform to point out a systemic issue that needs to change.

[–] urushitan@kakera.kintsugi.moe 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

And the multiple "It's not [x], it's [y]"
"sword | question mark"
"strategy | empty room"

[–] Fmstrat@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Now you're just quoting redditors.