this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2026
670 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

85739 readers
4118 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

In a nutshell this is impossible because of how the global supply chain works. Specifically how most of the hardware engineers/factories are in Taiwan, and how the technology to make chips is proprietarily owned by a company in Norway.

Like the whole reason China wants Tiawan in the first place is the same reason they can't just bomb them into submission... Their population of highly skilled hardware engineers that fundamentally make the global chips supply chain possible is impossible to replace.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

And China also can't really invade because all the facilities that make the silicon are rigged to self destruct if China puts boots on their soil, at least last I heard.

[–] Canconda@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 hours ago

It's a lot of things. But complex tech can involve literally thousands of hardware engineers. Each with very specific skills.

The proximity of these highly skilled workers to cheap chinese labour is another reason why this is difficult to replicate elsewhere.

[–] Reddfugee42@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I mean, it would bring global tech to a standstill. It would be a significant problem. Once existing stuff broke, there would be no replacement. I know very little about chip manufacture, except that the lithography machines are fantastically complex and costly. It would probably take years to spin up new production.

This seems like a pretty solid mutually assured destruction deterrent and doesn't even involve nukes.

[–] Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

You have clearly and concisely explained the exact reason the US wouldn't and couldn't allow China to invade Taiwan (well, wouldn't under a rational administration).

[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 2 points 14 hours ago

From what I can find, it looks like ASML has a software brick they can just drop into the update stream. As cool as physical disabling would be, a remote software trigger is simpler and leaves the machines in tact to spin back up after aggression ends

[–] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

AsmL is a dutch company...

Also ,i'm not sure if HBM requires the smallest nodes