this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Soccer (Closing)

157 readers
1 users here now

This community is being retired in favor of !football@soccer.forum.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Sure-Respect6914@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mean do you really need both Nations league and Euro’s?

[–] qu1x0t1cZ@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I’m sure when the Nations League was first announced UEFA said that it would eventually replace Euros qualifiers. Probably changed their minds in favour of more cash.

As an aside I hate how big the Euros has become. When I was a kid it was 16 teams representing most of the top 20 international teams in the world. Short tournament, high quality, good fun. Now it’s too diluted.

[–] moonski@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The euros was peak at 16. Almost no dead rubbers even in the groups, just a quality tournament all round.

[–] juve_merda@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

16 team euros was brutal, 1 bad game in he group and you could be out

now it just has a ton of filler, which on one hand is nice for the smaller nations that wouldn’t get to compete otherwise, but it always means some low stakes games

[–] Nahcep@alien.top 1 points 2 years ago

Technically you could make them different, let's say one in a classic format and one closer to current Champions' League with League A being the main qualification route - it would still keep the challenge between low-rated teams while keeping the tournament finals in the other

Right now they are redundant, yeah