this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2026
536 points (98.7% liked)
Funny
15397 readers
613 users here now
General rules:
- Be kind.
- All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
- Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
- No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
- Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.
Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
That's a quite a statement to make about a movie with near-universal critical acclaim and six Academy Awards (though I'll admit those can be somewhat meaningless). What was your issue with it?
I kind of already explained with 'There and back again', so I'll take that point as read. But also, there's no depth, substance, or narrative complexity to the plot, it exists only as a vehicle (pun very much intended) for chase sequences and 'splosions. And the constant action becomes a monotony because there's no contrast to it. I mean, it was spectacular but it was also a vapid nothing of a film as empty as the gas tanks of all those vehicles never actually seemed to be.
The plot was thin and no conclusion on the end, purely to keep suspension up for a maybe 2. part. And the likeable characters had as much holes and inconsistencies as the plot.
Basically the fast food of cinema, but with some extra uncanny valley.
But maybe it's just that i've seen the original and the 2. part and am a bit distraught of what they've made out of it. Basically, "What if we took this and added more explosions and weird machines. And a desert cult! With some weird for effect!".