!books@lemmy.world - Discussing books and book-related things.
!comicbooks@lemmy.world - A place to discuss comic books of all types.
!marvelstudios@lemmy.world - LW's home for all things MCU.
While posting and commenting in this community, you must abide by the Lemmy.World Terms of Service: https://legal.lemmy.world/tos/
Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, ableist, or advocating violence will be removed.
Be civil: disagreements happen, but that doesn’t provide the right to personally insult others.
Spam, self promotion, trolling, and bots are not allowed
Shitposts and memes are allowed until they prove to be a problem.
Regarding spoilers; Please put "(Spoilers)" in the title of your post if you anticipate spoilers, as we do not currently have a spoiler tag available. If your post contains an image that could be considered a spoiler, please mark the thread as NSFW so the image gets blurred. As far as how long to wait until the post is no longer a spoiler, please just use your best judgement. Everyone has a different idea on this, so we don't want to make any hard limits.
Please use spoiler tags whenever commenting a spoiler in a non-spoiler thread. Most of the Lemmy clients don't support this but we want to get into the habit as clients will be supporting in the future.
Failure to follow these guidelines will result in your post/comment being removed and/or more severe actions. All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users. We ask that the users report any comment or post that violates the rules, and to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting.
The early word we’ve gotten thus far is that Coppola’s self-funded $120 million epic is a perplexing film. It’s been described as “batsh*t crazy.” “baffling,” “downright confounding,” “undefinable,” “fit for a museum” and the “work of a madman.”
They had me at "batshit crazy", everything else is icing on the cake, albeit weird cake.
If the chum bucket that is Hollywood says they won't do it, sign me up. I'm so tired of their garbage.
Am I crazy or does anyone else think it's strange a FFC film is "finding distribution"?! Like even if it's an ungodly piece of shit, American studios could still probably make money off his name alone. Like did he just forget to let his agent know he made a new movie? Lmao
Just running ads with "From the academy award wining writer and director of the Godfather Trilogy, Apocalypse Now, and co-author of Patton comes..."
It's supposedly super weird. Like in a "nobody will get this shit" way. Which makes me just wanna see it more. If film nuts and critics find it insane, it's gotta be good.
Oh for sure I'll watch it out of respect if nothing else haha.
It's going to be bad. Very bad lol
Film lovers will never forget.
General audiences is an entirely different scenario.
For so many people, those Coppola films are more distant to them than "Gone With The Wind" was to me growing up. And you never saw anybody my age talking about having seen "Gone With The Wind" and saying "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn" to each other.
Oh wow with regard to myself this is a better advertisement than they could ever have done! I now definitely want to see the film
This could mean either it is really a piece of sh*t, or they just didn't recognize a future cult classic. I'll definitely will have a look once it is easily available, and decide the question for me.
It could also be that they are risk-adverse, hence all the franchises, sequels and remakes.
I did wonder if he was asking a lot for the rights to cover his investment but the article says this:
No word yet on how much they paid to nab the rights to “Megalopolis,” but I can’t imagine it being that high given that Le Pacte isn’t necesarilly a studio known to dish out an inordinate amount of money for a film.
The American distribution rights will be more but it might not be as high as I suspected and he may be asking for a higher cut of the take. Which they also might not like - after all, this is an industry that used creative accounting to fuck over the writer of Forrest Gump so badly he refused to option the sequel.
However, at this point you have to wonder if a director's self-funded project that he wrote and directed himself without any oversight might be pretentious and dull. All that said, you couldn't pay for all thr publicity this has got and I can't see them not breaking even.
I'm intrigued. Hopefully this will trigger a US release.
Having never seen the original film is that also 'bat shit insane' or has FFC just decided to do his own thing with the material?
You're confusing the title with Metropolis by Fritz Lang I assume. That was my first thought as well.
Yeah, you're dead right, lol. My mistake!
This is an original film.
I'd just love to see something non-formulaic this year. With the writer's strikes, and state of the film industry, I'll take anything at this point.
(Don't interpret this as criticism of the writer's guild. The people who make the art should absolutely be able to support themselves while executive split blockbuster profits)
