Those who make non-violent revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
93 points (98.9% liked)
Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.
5246 readers
635 users here now
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
,>A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in a five-page order that the case should have been dismissed after the court first weighed in on the matter in 2020, when it said courts could not mandate broad policy changes that are better left to Congress and the executive branch.
While the young plaintiffs have since trimmed the lawsuit to seek only a declaration that their rights have been violated, the 9th Circuit said lawsuits must address harms that can be remedied by courts and such a declaration would not directly help the plaintiffs.
3 judges just told an entire generation that they don't have a case. The next generation needs to take over Congress to make this decision.
I fail to see how anyone can not recognize the USA is a full blown kleptocracy.
In Pakistan the Lahore High Court was able to rule that the government was in violation of climate protection. So I guess rule of law is better in Pakistan then it is in the US.
The countries have different laws and legal systems and balance of power between different parts of the government. Not about "rule of law is better" but about those differences.