this post was submitted on 07 May 2024

121 points (89.5% liked)

Privacy

31872 readers

524 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

Chat rooms

[Matrix/Element]Dead
Discord

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

121

The Bitcoiners were wrong: a blog post about privacy and bitcoin, and how they failed to design a cash alternative (unfathom.ing)

submitted 6 months ago by UnHidden@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 31 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] shrugal@lemm.ee 38 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I think some of the arguments are quite flawed. Bitcoin itself has most of the properties it is said to have, but it lives in a world that doesn't and so some only really apply if you manage to stay inside the system. Like, your Signal chats are private as long as you don't copy-paste them to Facebook.

Regarding self-custody/decentralization and using custodial services: The problem here is not that those properties don't apply to Bitcoin, but that some people just choose to give away control over their wallets or not use Bitcoin itself for certain transactions. Can't blame that on the currency, unless you think it can't be done any other way.

Regarding privacy: I don't think any serious "Bitcoiner" advertises Bitcoin as private. The message has always been that it's "pseudonymous", that you have to take extra steps in order to make it anonymous, and that it's transparent instead of private by design.

Regarding transparency/inclusion: These paragraphs actually argue about privacy again. One is trying to spin the existing transparency into a negative, which is a valid opinion but not something "Bitcoiners" are wrong about. The other circles back to the idea of staying inside the system. Bitcoin transactions are inclusive, but ofc you can still get into trouble if you have to fear external repercussions and can't stay anonymous.

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz 5 points 6 months ago

Thanks for the breakdown. When I read the headline, I guessed at a bunch of what the article said and you confirmed most of it.

[–] UnHidden@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago

Monero doesn't have most of these problems...

[–] PiratePanPan@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Bitcoin was both a massive failure and success - a failure because it ended up not accomplishing its biggest goal of being a bank killer, but a success because it demonstrated not only the demand but that such a system wasn't a complete moonshot.

/circlejerk

XMR 2 da moon!!!!

[–] smileyhead@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Was a fan of Bitcoin, until found out about this.

[–] massivefailure@lemm.ee 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Also the fact Bitcoin is essentially a pyramid scheme. Get more people into it to artificially inflate its value, take the profits, leave everyone else with diminished value, build it up again, get rich, repeat forever.

Crypto should be illegal.

[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Crypto IS usable as an alternative to regular card payments though. If it gets illegal - what do we have left for online payment? Bank system, which is very hard and illegal to use anonymously, and is subject to sanctions/seizures/whatever. There is cash by mail, which is not always feasible. GNU Taler looks interesting, but seems like it not implemented much yet.

[–] shootwhatsmyname@lemm.ee 5 points 6 months ago

Risky link click of the day

[–] thebardingreen@lemmy.starlightkel.xyz -4 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I always find these breakdowns to be a little bit disingenuous. Like, you could do this same analysis on the whole email system, or on the whole world wide banking system, including ATMs, or on the energy usage of all DNS queries or even on global ActivityPub activity, not to mention shopping on Amazon or browsing Facebook. People DO do these kinds of breakdowns on generative AI, for exactly the same reasons, and reach the same kinds of conclusions.

Having a global computer network is INCREDIBLY energy intensive, with a massive carbon footprint. It's not shocking that a given application of that network is energy intensive, with a massive carbon footprint. These kinds of analysis are put together by people who already don't like cryptocurrencies (for all kinds of reasons both valid and ridiculous) who then go cherry picking MORE reasons not to like them.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 25 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A better comparison would be energy utilized per user, in which case the energy requirements for Bitcoin are miles and miles ahead of what the average person produces using a computer in the same amount of time. Even a gamer, playing 4k 120fps ray traced games 12 hours a day would use a fraction of the energy of someone mining bitcoin.

[–] unlawfulbooger@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Exactly, if we do a back of the napkin calculation:

Bitcoin

Users

There are 200 million bitcoin wallets, let’s be generous and say those are all owned by unique individuals.

Total energy consumption

Bitcoin used about 114 TWh in 2021[1]

Bitcoin currently uses about 150 TWh annually

Energy consumption per user

150 TWh / year 
————————— = 0,75 TWh / user / year
200 million users

Banking system

Users

There are over 8 billion people on the planet today, let’s assume 4 billion of them have access to the global banking system.

Total energy consumption

The global banking system used an estimated 264 TWh in 2021[1]

If we assume the same consumption increase rate for banking, that’s about 348 TWh/year currently.

Energy consumption per user

348 TWh / year 
————————— = 0,087 TWh / user / year
4.000 million users

With these numbers, bitcoin uses almost 10x the energy per user annually.

There are of course a myriad of things one can argue over whether it makes a fair comparison, none of which I feel like arguing, since this is just a really simple estimate with a lot of assumptions.

1: I used the numbers in this article uncritically, if you have better numbers you can run your own calculations.

[+] alekwithak@lemmy.world -22 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

How much energy is used by our current financial system? How much energy is consumed serving ads to every human on every platform every second of every day?? No one ever questions that totally necessary use of our limited resources 🙄

Edit: Didn't realize you guys like ads.and the federal reserve so much. That's gonna be a pretty major Yikes from me, Bros.

[–] Corgana@startrek.website 22 points 6 months ago (2 children)

How much energy is used by our current financial system?

Orders of magnitude less than Bitcoin requires, which is the criticism.

[+] delirious_owl@discuss.online -16 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Dont spread misinformation. Its the opposite.

Bitcoin energy usage is negligible next to financial sector. And it doesnt increase as the transaction count increases, unlike tradfi

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 11 points 6 months ago

The financial sector offers a magnitude more services than just "transactions". It's a stupid comparison.

[–] pedroapero@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

In actually decreases with time (by half every four year, unless the value increases equally, which is unlikely in the long run). However you should compare the energy per transaction, which is pretty lame (5txs per seconds or similar).

[–] Rin@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

XMR exists

[–] shortwavesurfer@monero.town 8 points 6 months ago

Monero ftw

[–] Gargari@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Monero is here and always been. Research, and find you yourself. Monero is what Bitcoin was supposed to be

[–] Lemmchen@feddit.de 5 points 6 months ago

but Bitcoin does nothing to prevent custodial exchanges, in the way something like Monero does

In what way does Monero prevent that?

[–] Scolding0513@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 months ago

imagine if all the huge amount of support and effort that gets put into a nonfungible traceable system (btc) got put into monero. we wouls have such a strong community of cypherpunks

[–] delirious_owl@discuss.online 0 points 6 months ago

I've been dumping btc for xmr