Mhm i can imagine that GrapheneOS will be marked as an illegal OS once Interpol and others get wind of this kill switch.
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2024
253 points (100.0% liked)
Privacy
48873 readers
569 users here now
A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.
Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.
In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.
Some Rules
- Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
- Don't promote proprietary software
- Try to keep things on topic
- If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
- Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
- Be nice :)
Related communities
much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
The people Interpool is after don't need Duress. They simply refuse to give out their password. Current Pixel and iPhones phones cannt be cracked with forensic tools. https://discuss.grapheneos.org/d/12848-claims-made-by-forensics-companies-their-capabilities-and-how-grapheneos-fares
Doubt it, wouldn't they just clone the flash first?
irreversibly wipe the device
And for anyone to actually go through the trouble of cloning a flash chip, you'd have to be an extremely high profile target.
Who the fuck do you think interpol are targeting? Lmao
That may be useful
Wonder if this say a big "WIPING..." and shows a blank profile then.
Because it would be much more useful if this would erase real profile and then quickly switch to some fake profile looking real.
It doesn't say anything. It shuts the device down almost instantly, and simulnateously wipes the encryption keys from the secure element, ensuring that the data stored on the SSD can't be decrypted.
Long overdue
Why didn't you contribute this feature sooner then?
I'm maxed out on open source contributions myself right now as maintainer of a large project
... and I've been told I'm demanding and entitled, but here's some jackass who downvoted one(@ryannathans) who is doing the work. You or I can never do enough to be worthy to request certain features or bug-fixes be given higher priority.
These people need to go back to Spez's, Musk's, or Zuck's playground, since they love having no say so much.
Cool feature, I wonder if a duress fingerprint will be introduced in the future?
I feel like that would be a lot easier to accidentally trigger.
You're not wrong, but like the duress pin, it would be a nice feature to have. Not everyone would have to set a duress fingerprint, just the people who find value in it.
something something destruction of evidence
What evidence?
Alternately, it could unlock the phone while also erasing specific parts of it, like message history and call logs, potentially replacing them with something you'd set up previously.
Edit: and obviously it would disable the duress pin and set the unlocking pin to it.
Depends on what you did! Say for example they're using Graphene to harass/paedophilia then they already have a copious amount of evidence on hand since they are there.
For organising peaceful protests that seems less of an issue and the other end of the chats is the weak link.
Very nice