this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2024
518 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

59188 readers
3138 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lawyers for Elon Musk on Tuesday moved to dismiss the billionaire’s lawsuit against OpenAI and CEO Sam Altman, ending a months-long legal battle between co-founders of the artificial intelligence startup.

Musk — who co-founded OpenAI in 2015 — sued the company in March, accusing the ChatGPT maker of abandoning its original, nonprofit mission by reserving some of its most advanced AI technology for private customers. The lawsuit had sought a jury trial and for the company, Altman and co-founder and president Greg Brockman to pay back any profit they received from the business.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@vger.social 287 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

OpenAI, meanwhile, accused Musk of essentially being jealous that he was no longer involved in the startup, after he left OpenAI in 2018 following an unsuccessful bid to convince his fellow co-founders to let Tesla acquire it.

So a spoiled brat had a massive hissy fit after not getting his way? Yeah, that sounds like Elon alright.

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 85 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yeah he didn’t give a shit if they switched to for-profit, he was just mad he wasn’t getting some of that profit

[–] gressen@lemm.ee 45 points 5 months ago

Imagine all the bullshit promises he would make if he bought ChatGPT.

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 183 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The emails appeared to show Musk acknowledging the need for the company to make large sums of money to fund the computing resources needed to power its AI ambitions, which stood in contrast to the claims in his lawsuit that OpenAI was wrongly pursuing profit.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Didn't that get leaked a while back? Or he posted something similarly to Twitter? I vaguely recall him saying that not all that long ago.

[–] dudeami0@lemmy.dudeami.win 65 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sadly it wasn't a bid to open source the AI, rather than a bid for payment.

[–] match@pawb.social 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I don't think open-sourcing matters too much here: the datasets are all open sourced and the technique itself is published and well documented. OpenAI's advantage ia that they can burn the $10 million in processor energy that it costs to train each new model of GPT.

edit: Up through GPT-3, that is (GPT-4 is worse and I don't know why people would want it)

[–] Paradox@lemdro.id 60 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Can we just have both entities annihilate each other? Please? They're both shit

[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 13 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Trial by combat. Winner gets executed.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

And the loser, but we'll put "they were right tho" on the tombstone.

[–] NeoNachtwaechter@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

Yes, please.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 52 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Elon Musk embarrasses himself by spouting unsubstantiated bullshit yet again. More news at ten.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

Can't embarrass yourself if you're incapable of feeling shame.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

He's absolutely correct.

He's just also a lying hypocrite who wanted to be the one profiting and the texts show it.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 47 points 5 months ago

Normally seeing after how big tech companies use AI, I would agree with him but he prolly just wants X AI to be the next big thing so he is jealous.

[–] SouthFresh@lemmy.ml 40 points 5 months ago

"Toddler drops lawsuit"

[–] Psych@lemmy.sdf.org 36 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (4 children)

Wait a moment did I just read that musk kinda fought to make open AI nonprofit lol ? Insert the worst person you knew made a great point meme here

[–] TwigletSparkle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 46 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pretty sure Musky boy is annoyed that they profiteered off of the non-profit because that's exactly what he would do amd they got there first.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

amd

Interesting slip there haha

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

yes, very interesting how the n and m keys are right next to each other. 🤔

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago (1 children)

There's definitely treachery afoot

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Someone should really look into this.

[–] Psych@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 4 months ago

Its a global conspiracy from our over lords . Hush now and bash your head over a desk until you forget everything or suffer .

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 16 points 4 months ago

Not in the slightest. It was just his flimsy excuse to sue a competitor/someone he doesn't like, and the released emails show he doesn't believe a word of it. That's why he dropped it.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

A broken clock is right twice a day. He's more like a broken calendar, but still.

[–] sodamnfrolic@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

There's 1440 minutes per day, a lock that's right twice a day is right for 1/720th of the time. A broken calendar, right for one day of 365, is actually accurate twice as often as a broken clock.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 2 points 4 months ago

And that assumes no second hand

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

No, he was vindictively attacking a company he was involved with.

It just happened to be good for others.

[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 12 points 5 months ago
[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 months ago
[–] uebquauntbez@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

free speech ftw!1!!