this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
306 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37608 readers
291 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

...and the related Mozilla report

all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 67 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nissan apparently collects "Sensitive personal information, including driver's license number, national or state identification number, citizenship status, immigration status, race, national origin, religious or philosophical beliefs, sexual orientation, sexual activity, precise geolocation, health diagnosis data, and genetic information."

I guess Subaru don't need telemetry to guess your sexual orientation.

[–] genuineparts@feddit.de 43 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 year ago

It depends.

Naturally-aspirated: lesbian with a shitty haircut, a denim vest, and 500 granola crunchy hippie stickers

Turbo: straight white male with a chinstrap, fake diamond stud earring, and 500 aftermarket parts supplier stickers

[–] yoz@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago
[–] TimeMuncher2@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

Seats moving up and down on bumpy road.
Car sensor : sexual activity in progress.

[–] PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Thanks a lot for your post ! The future of cars looks grim.

Serious and naive question: how could I get rid of the tracking at the hardware level when I will have no choice other than to buy a connected car?
Is there an antenna or a SIM card somewhere that I could disconnect/remove? Would the car continue to work if the connection to the manufacturer's server is lost?

[–] jherazob@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No idea, but for starters say goodbye to navigation, it likely uses an internet connection

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago

Built-in nav is trash, anyway. I’ve always used my phone.

[–] PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

For recent cars I am afraid you are right. My current and "old" car has a built in navigation system with the map on an SD-card. No need for a connection to a smartphone - which I do not own. Therefore I suppose it is not communicating with the manufacturer.

Then, someone in my family with a more recent car got several "firmware updates" out of the blue, hinting to a 'permanent' connection to the manufacturer.

I have the feeling we need to start organizing and claim a "right to disconnection". Having the car dial for help after a crash is one thing but what Mozilla's report describes is at another, much higher level.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cars are built in modules, so there is definitely something you could disconnect to prevent it phoning home. You might need to take the dashboard apart though.

There is nothing preventing the car from starting and running without it. As long as you have a key fob it will attempt to start.

[–] PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks! Knowing that what I might be searching for would be somewhere under the dashboard is a good first step.

Then I am not an engineer nor have any experience in electronics BUT I know from my dad that taking the dashboard apart is not an easy task. If I would succeed I do not know what I would be looking for… Would tan antenna look like a piece of wire? Or could it be embedded in the 'copper' circuitry of a PCB? Do cars use regular SIM cards like the ones found in phones or would they look different?

The maintenance manual would probably be a good place to start before trying to put anything apart.

[–] algorithmae@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Every platform is different. The maintenance manual won't tell you as it's not part of maintenance. If you really want a piece of literature then you'll need a factory service manual, but no offense if you don't know what you're doing you WILL cause damage to your vehicle (or even yourself if you accidentally mess with the airbags)

[–] PeutMieuxFaire@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Valid point, no offense taken. I did not think about the airbags! As for damages to the vehicle, this is something I understand an am willing to accept. If I do stupid things I have to face consequences.
Anyway, getting the help of a mechanic would be point number 1 on my list. If can find one willing to take the challenge :)

[–] strawberry@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

+1, I’d really like to know the answer to this too.

[–] gt5@beehaw.org 21 points 1 year ago

Tangentially related: I have a 2022 Subaru, I used to have a 2021 Subaru. Subaru has a mobile app where I can start the car, locate it, unlock the doors, etc. When I traded in the 2021, it never removed it from my app. I’m able to see where the car is parked, and presumably start it, open the doors, whatever.

I tried contacting Subaru, I looked for a bug reporting or bug bounty but couldn’t find one anywhere. All I could find was instructions to remove the car off of my app. I view this as a huge privacy breach, it shouldn’t be my responsibility to remove the previous owners info from the app.

[–] adora@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

maybe its just me, but as useful and nice to know as this is, I really want Mozilla to focus their efforts on making a good browser, not to spend money doing everything but that.

There are a lot of anti-features (studies, pocket, telemetry, "sponsored suggestions", etc..) that are justified in "we have to make money somehow" but then they spend it on this stuff.

[edited for clarity]

[–] propaganja@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hot take: their browser is good.

[–] adora@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure, I mean I want them to focus their energy on it.
There are a lot of anti-features (studies, pocket, telemetry, "sponsored suggestions", etc..) that are justified in "we have to make money somehow" but then they spend it on this stuff.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Their goal is a healthy and open internet, with the browser being one method of achieving that.

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

This particular issue is important enough that I'm glad they did it. We needed somebody to do it, and if that means a tiny bit of funding was diverted from browser work, I think it was more than worth it.

(Also, the Mozilla Foundation is not the same as the Mozilla Corporation.)

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I skimmed the article. Some manufacturers are not listed. Mazda for one.

Edit: I am unclear. Should I presume Mazda and others that are not listed are doinga good job?

[–] Pfnic@feddit.ch 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In Mozilla's "Privacy not included" report, Mazda isn't listed as one of the 25 car brands they tested.

Their related article goes on to state, that all of the 25 brands they tested earned the Label, which I take to mean, that by extension probably most if not every car brand has privacy flaws.

[–] nezrock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

I too came looking for Mazda in the report and was disappointed.

[–] moist_towelettes@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I skimmed through their privacy policy and I'm not confident Mozilla would approve. They can share the telemetry that comes from your car, including it's physical location.

https://www.mazdausa.com/site/privacy-connectedservices

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Should I presume Mazda and others that are not listed are doinga good job?

Doubtful. Absence from a list like this usually just means that the people investigating had limited resources, and therefore chose a representative sample instead of doing an exhaustive survey.

If this report gets much attention, it would be a good opportunity for any car makers that do well on privacy (if they exist) to start boldly advertising it.

[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

asking you to do things no reasonable person would ever do -- like reciting a 9,461-word privacy policy to everyone who opens your car’s doors.

If this is what they say we agree by tapping that license button, how about they put this on their TV ads?

[–] senoro@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Make sure to sign the petition at the bottom of the mozilla report.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Done

As expected, Tesla has the worst privacy rating

Second worst were these ones:

Nissan earned its second-to-last spot for collecting some of the creepiest categories of data we have ever seen. It’s worth reading the review in full, but you should know it includes your “sexual activity.” Not to be out done, Kia also mentions they can collect information about your “sex life” in their privacy policy. Oh, and six car companies say they can collect your “genetic information” or “genetic characteristics.” Yes, reading car privacy policies is a scary endeavor.

While they're all bad, Nissan is a no for me. Also between this, the dangerous recalls, and the theft issue, Kia is falling even further down my list

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

Kia has the whole “getting stolen really easily” thing right now, as well…

Why does it not surprise me to see a certain elongated muskrat razing privacy policies to the floor, again